|
|
Exploration of a Novel Noninvasive Deep Brain Precision Stimulation Method Based on MultiphysicsField Complexes |
Zhu Kai, Zhou Xiaoqing, Ma Ren, Liu Xu, Yin Tao, Liu Zhipeng* |
(Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Tianjing 300192, China) |
|
|
Abstract Existing noninvasive electromagnetic stimulation technologies, represented by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the most widely used clinical technology, are still unable to break through the technical bottlenecks of focus and stimulation depth and achieve direct and precise stimulation of deep functional nuclei. Based on the theory of magneto-acoustic coupling, combined with the alternating magnetic field in TMS, we proposed a new non-invasive deep brain stimulation method (magnetic induction-transcranial magneto-acoustic stimulation, MI-TMAS) based on multi-physical field composite, aiming to achieve deep brain stimulation, direct and precise focus stimulation. This paper simulated the stimulation physical fields in MI-TMAS based on the magneto-acoustic coupling theory and magnetic induction theory; and built the MI-TMAS system and multi-physics test platform and conducted actual measurements. Combining simulation and actual measurement results, the focus and electric field strength of the MI-TMAS composite stimulation electric field were explored. The results showed that this method generated three composite stimulation physical fields including focused acoustic field, magneto-acoustic coupling electric field, and magnetic induction electric field in the deep brain target area. By this way, a composite stimulation electric field with width of6.2 mm (-3dB) at a stimulation depth of 50 mm was formed, which is in the deep brain. The focusing of the electric field was significantly better than that of TMS, and the stimulation electrical field intensity was greater than that of TMAS under a steady magnetic field. In conclusion, this method provided a theoretical and technical basis for the MI-TMAS method to be applied to in vivo neuromodulation.
|
Received: 18 December 2023
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
* E-mail:zpeng67@163.com
|
|
|
|
[1] Chase HW, Boudewyn MA, Carter CS, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a roadmap for research, from mechanism of action to clinical implementation[J]. MolPsychiatry, 2020, 25(2): 397-407. [2] Klomjai W, Katz R, Lackmy-Vallee A. Basic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS (rTMS)[J]. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 2015, 58(4): 208-213. [3] Wang H, Zhou X, Cui D, et al. Comparative study of transcranial magneto-acoustic stimulation and transcranial ultrasound stimulation of motor cortex[J]. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2019, 13:241. [4] Chatterjee SS, Mitra S, Mehta UM, et al. Theta-burst rTMS may improve psychomotor retardation in geriatric depression - a case report[J]. Asian J Psychiatr, 2020, 54: 102301. [5] Sabesan P, Lankappa S, Khalifa N, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for geriatric depression: Promises and pitfalls[J]. World J Psychiatry, 2015, 5(2): 170-181. [6] Koutsomitros T, Evagorou O, Schuhmann T, et al. Advances in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and its applications in resistant depression[J]. Psychiatriki, 2021, 32: 90-98. [7] Amico E, Bodart O, Rosanova M, et al. Tracking dynamic interactions between structural and functional connectivity: a TMS/EEG-dMRI study[J]. Brain Connect, 2017, 7(2): 84-97. [8] Terao Y, Ugawa Y. Basic mechanisms of TMS[J]. J Clin Neurophysiol, 2002, 19(4): 322-343. [9] Norton S J. Can ultrasound be used to stimulate nerve tissue?[J]. Biomed Eng Online, 2003, 2:6. [10] 杨少华.一种基于磁声耦合的神经电流检测和无创刺激方法[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2006. [11] Zhang Shuai, Wang Zhuo, Hou Wanjiao, et al. Design of a new low-intensity focused ultrasound stimulation system with homogeneous magnetic field[C]//2016 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Shenzhen: IEEE, 2016, 1(1): 738-740. [12] 周晓青,刘世坤,张鑫山,等. 经颅磁声刺激中超声刺激的作用与影响[J]. 医疗卫生装备, 2018, 39(5): 17-21, 49. [13] Liu Ruixu, Ma Ren, Liu Xu, et al. A noninvasive deep brain stimulation method via temporal-spatial interference magneto-acoustic effect: simulation and experimental validation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 2022, 69(8): 2474-2483. [14] Ma X, Wang X, Zhu K, et al. Study on the role of physical fields in TMAS to modulate synaptic plasticity in mice[J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2023, 71(5): 1-11. [15] Chu Fangxuan, Tan Ruxin, Wang Xin, et al. Transcranial magneto-acoustic stimulation attenuates synaptic plasticity impairment through the activation of piezo1 in Alzheimer’s disease mouse model[J]. Research, 2023, 6: 0130. [16] Zhang S, Guo Z, Xu Y, et al. Transcranial magneto-acoustic stimulation improves spatial memory and modulates hippocampal neural oscillations in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease[J]. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2024, 18:1313639. [17] Yuan Yi, Chen Yudong, Li Xiaoli. Theoretical analysis of transcranial magneto-acoustical stimulation with Hodgkin-Huxley neuron model[J]. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 2016, 10:35. [18] Montalibet A, Jossinet J, Matias A, et al. Electric current generated by ultrasonically induced Lorentz force in biological media[J]. Med Biol Eng Comput, 2001, 39(1): 15-20. [19] Wang Yuexiang, Feng Lina, Liu Shikun, et al. Transcranial magneto-acoustic stimulation improves neuroplasticity in hippocampus of Parkinson′s disease model mice[J]. Neurotherapeutics, 2019, 16(4): 1210-1224. [20] Dannhauer M, Gomez LJ, Robins PL, et al. Electric field modeling in personalizing TMS interventions[J]. 2024, 95(6): 494-501. [21] Chenxi Li, Bin Xue, Zihui Yang. Direct measurement of the sound velocity in water based on the acousto-optic signal[J]. Appl Opt, 2021, 60(8): 2455-2464. [22] Deng Z, Lisanby SH, Peterchev AV. Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs[J]. Brain Stimulation, 2013, 6(1):1-13. [23] Koessler L, Colnat-Coulbois S, Cecchin T, et al. In-vivo measurements of human brain tissue conductivity using focal electrical current injection through intracerebral multicontact electrodes[J]. Human Brain Mapping, 2017, 38(2):974-986. [24] Mccann H, Pisano G, Beltrachini L. Variation in reported human head tissue electrical conductivity values[J]. Brain Topography, 2019, 32(5):825-858. [25] Huang Y, Liu AA, Lafon B, et al. Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation[J]. 2017, 6: e18834. [26] Akalin Acar Z, Acar CE, Makeig S. Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation[J]. NeuroImage,2016,124:168-180. [27] Carvallo A, Modolo J, Benquet P, et al. Biophysical modeling for brain tissue conductivity estimation using SEEG electrodes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering,2019,66(6):1695-1704. [28] Darmani G, Bergmann TO, Butts PK, et al. Non-invasive transcranial ultrasound stimulation for neuromodulation[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2022, 135: 51-73. [29] Liu A, Vöröslakos M, Kronberg G, et al. Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 5092. |
[1] |
Li Runze, Yang Shuo, Feng Keke, Wang Alan, Tian Shuxiang, Yin Shaoya, Xu Guizhi. Research Progress on Potential Brain Stimulation Targets of rTMS for Alleviating Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2023, 42(3): 345-352. |
[2] |
Guo Miaomiao, Ji Lihui, Zhang Tianheng, Wang Zhonghao, Xu Guizhi. Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Different Protocols on Causal Network Connection of Local Field Potential during Working Memory Task in Rats[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2023, 42(2): 158-167. |
|
|
|
|