脑-机交互运动训练的神经反馈方法及康复应用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-8021.2021.06.09

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (6872 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Movement (or motor) is one of the most important forms of human survival, labour and communication with the outside world. However, some accidents or diseases can lead to the loss of partial or total motor functions of the human beings. Specifically, stroke has become the first major factor leading to the disability disease in China and the whole world. However, the conventional rehabilitation therapies are difficult to induce the synchronous coupling of corticomuscular function, especially the theoretical guidance of the mirror neuron system and neuroplasticity is lack, resulting in the limitation of the final rehabilitation effectiveness. Recently, the brain-computer interface (BCI) and/or other emerging human-machine technologies based on the neurofeedback training (NFT) method has emerged, which makes it quantitatively observable for the information of central nervous system and real-time perceptible for limb movement, thereby promoting functional reconstruction of the whole neural pathway and motor system. By summarizing the basic NFT principle of BCI training, combined with fusion and clinical application of current feedback training methods based on visual, auditory, tactile, and multi-sensory, it is expected that the future BCI training works in multi-sensory coordination and training mode becomes closed-loop controllable and adjustable based on the combination of initiative and external auxiliary function.

Key words： neurofeedback training brain-computer interface motor rehabilitation mirror neuron neural plasticity

Received: 28 October 2020

PACS:

R318

About author:: ^#Member, Chinese Society of Biomedical Engineering

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	He Feng
	He Beibei
	Wang Zhongpeng
	ChenLong
	Ming Dong

Cite this article:

He Feng,He Beibei,Wang Zhongpeng, et al. Motor Training and its Rehabilitation Application Based on the Neurofeedback Methods of Brain-Computer Interaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2021, 40(6): 719-730.

URL:

http://cjbme.csbme.org/EN/10.3969/j.issn.0258-8021.2021.06.09 OR http://cjbme.csbme.org/EN/Y2021/V40/I6/719

[1] Haggard P, Eimer M. On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements [J]. Experimental Brain Research, 1999, 126(1):128-133.
[2] Pryluk R, Paz R. Learning outside the box [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019, 116(31): 15316-15318.
[3] Weiland S, Smit IH, Reinders-Messelink H, et al. The effect of asymmetric movement support on muscle activity during Lokomat guided gait in able-bodied individuals [J]. PLoS ONE, 2018, 13(6): e0198473.
[4] WHO. World Health Statistics 2014-Part III Global Health Indicators [M]. Italy: World Health Organization, 2014: 55-175.
[5] 中国脑卒中防治报告编写组. 我国脑卒中防治仍面临巨大挑战——《中国脑卒中防治报告2018》概要[J]. 中国循环杂志,2019,34(2):105-119.
[6] Poo M, Du J, Ip NY, et al. China brain project: basic neurosciences, brain diseases, and brain-inspired computing [J]. Neuron, 2016, 92(3): 591-596.
[7] Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, et al. Principles of Neural Science (Fifth Edition) [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2013.
[8] Fabbri-Destro M, Rizzolatti G. Mirror Neurons and mirror systems in monkeys and humans [J]. Physiology, 2008, 23(3):171-179.
[9] Pascual-Leone A, Freitas C, Oberman L, et al. Characterizing brain cortical plasticity and network dynamics across the age-span in health and disease with TMS-EEG and TMS-fMRI [J]. Brain Topography, 2011, 24(3-4):302-315.
[10] Turrigiano GG. The self-tuning neuron: synaptic scaling of excitatory synapses [J]. Cell, 2008, 135(3):422-435.
[11] Rich MM, Wenner P. Sensing and expressing homeostatic synaptic plasticity [J]. Trends in Neurosciences, 2007, 30(3):119-125.
[12] Alder G, Signal N, Olsen S, et al. A systematic review of paired associative stimulation (PAS) to modulate lower limb corticomotor excitability: Implications for stimulation parameter selection and experimental design [J]. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2019, 13: 895.
[13] Guan Z, Giustetto M, Lomvardas S, et al. Integration of long-term-memory-related synaptic plasticity involves bidirectional regulation of gene expression and chromatin structure [J]. Cell, 2002, 111(4):483-493.
[14] Krucoff MO, Miller JP, Saxena T, et al. Toward functional restoration of the central nervous system: a review of translational neuroscience principles [J]. Neurosurgery, 2019, 84(1): 30-40.
[15] Grimm F, Gharabaghi A. Closed-loop neuroprosthesis for reach-to-grasp assistance: combining adaptive multi-channel neuromuscular stimulation with a multi-joint arm exoskeleton [J]. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2016, 10: 284.
[16] Balasubramanian S, Garcia-Cossio E, Birbaumer N, et al. Is EMG a viable alternative to BCI for detecting movement intention in severe stroke? [J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2018, 65(12): 2790-2797.
[17] Liang WD, Xu Y, Schmidt J, et al. Upregulating excitability of corticospinal pathways in stroke patients using TMS neurofeedback: a pilot study [J]. NeuroImage: Clinical, 2020, 28: 102465.
[18] Ramos‐Murguialday A, Broetz D, Rea M, et al. Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study[J]. Annals of Neurology, 2013, 74(1): 100-108.
[19] Pfurtscheller G, Neuper C, Flotzinger D, et al. EEG-based discrimination between imagination of right and left hand movement[J]. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, 1997, 103(6): 642-651.
[20] Nierhaus T, Vidaurre C, Sannelli C, et al. Immediate brain plasticity after one hour of brain-computer interface (BCI) [J]. The Journal of Physiology, 2021,599(9):2435-2451.
[21] 万柏坤, 李佳, 明东. 用于肢体运动系统的神经假体研究进展[J]. 中国医疗器械杂志, 2006, 30(4):235-240.
[22] Kilgore KL, Peckham PH, Keith MW, et al. An implanted upper-extremity neuroprosthesis: Follow-up of five patients [J]. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1997, 79(4):533-541.
[23] Ijzerman MJ, Stoffers TS, Groen IFACG, et al. The NESS Handmaster othosis [J]. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences, 1996, 9(3):86-89.
[24] Prochazka A, Gauthier M, Wieler M, et al. The bionic glove: An electrical stimulator garment that provides controlled grasp and hand opening in quadriplegia [J]. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1997, 78(6):608-614.
[25] Hoshimiya N. A master-slave type multi-channel functional electrical stimulation (FES) system for the control of the paralyzed upper extremities [J]. Automedica, 1989,11: 209-220.
[26] Vodovnik L, Kralj A, Stanic U, et al. Recent applications of functional electrical stimulation to stroke patients in Ljubljana [J]. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1978, 131:64-70.
[27] Wieler M, Naaman S, Stein RB. WalkAid: An improved functional electrical stimulator for correcting foot-drop[C]//Proceedings of the first Annual Conference of International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society (IFESS). Dublin: IFESS, 1996: 101-104.
[28] 施俊, 胡跃辉, 周康源, 等. 运动神经假体研究进展[J]. 中国医疗器械杂志, 2004,28(4):271-276.
[29] Sitaram R, Ros T, Stoeckel L, et al. Closed-loop brain training: The science of neurofeedback [J]. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2017, 18(2):86-100.
[30] Zich C, Debener S, Kranczioch C, et al. Real-time EEG feedback during simultaneous EEG-fMRI identifies the cortical signature of motor imagery [J]. Neuroimage, 2015, 114: 438-447.
[31] Choi I, Kwon GH, Lee S, et al. Functional electrical stimulation controlled by motor imagery brain-computer interface for rehabilitation[J]. Brain Sciences, 2020, 10(8): 512.
[32] Young BM, Nigogosyan Z, Walton LM, et al. Changes in functional brain organization and behavioral correlations after rehabilitative therapy using a brain-computer interface [J]. Frontiers in Neuroengineering, 2014, 7:26.
[33] Reynolds C, Osuagwu BA, Vuckovic A. Influence of motor imagination on cortical activation during functional electrical stimulation [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2015, 126(7):1360-1369.
[34] Biasiucci A, Leeb R, Iturrate I, et al. Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke [J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 2421.
[35] Smith S. Mind-controlled exoskeleton kicks off World Cup [J]. New Scientist, 2014, 6(13): 2973.
[36] Ming Dong, Wang Kun, He Feng, et al. Study on physiological information detection and application evoked by motor imagery: Review and prospect [J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2014, 35 (9): 1921-1931.
[37] Jiang Shenglong, Chen Long, Wang Zhongpeng, et al. Application of BCI-FES system on stroke rehabilitation[C]// 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER). Montpellier: IEEE, 2015: 1112-1115.
[38] Im H, Ku J, Kim HJ, et al. Virtual reality-guided motor imagery increases corticomotor excitability in healthy volunteers and stroke patients [J]. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2016, 40(3): 420-431.
[39] Sczesny-Kaiser M, Hoffken O, Aach M, et al. HAL(R) exoskeleton training improves walking parameters and normalizes cortical excitability in primary somatosensory cortex in spinal cord injury patients[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2015, 12:68.
[40] Van Asseldonk EH, Boonstra TA. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the leg motor cortex enhances coordinated motor output during walking with a large inter-individual variability [J]. Brain Stimulation, 2016, 9(2):182-190.
[41] Bao Shichun, Khan A, Song R, et al. Rewiring the lesioned brain: Electrical stimulation for post-stroke motor restoration [J]. Journal of Stroke, 2020, 22(1): 47.
[42] Oujamaa L, Relave I, Froger J, et al. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review [J]. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 2009, 52(3):269-293.
[43] Sigrist R, Rauter G, Riener R, et al. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2013, 20(1):21-53.
[44] Timmermans AA, Seelen HA, Willmann RD, et al. Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: Concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design [J]. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 2009, 6(1):1.
[45] Proteau L. Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a video-aiming task [J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2005, 161(4):441-456.
[46] Proteau L, Isabelle G. On the role of visual afferent information for the control of aiming movements toward targets of different sizes [J]. Journal of Motor Behavior, 2002, 34(4):367-384.
[47] Sulzenbruck S, Heuer H. Type of visual feedback during practice influences the precision of the acquired internal model of a complex visuo-motor transformation [J]. Ergonomics, 2011, 54(1):34-46.
[48] Pellegrino L, Giannoni P, Marinelli L, et al. Effects of continuous visual feedback during sitting balance training in chronic stroke survivors[J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2017, 14(1): 1-14.
[49] Valdés BA, Khoshnam M, Neva JL, et al. Robotics-assisted visual-motor training influences arm position sense in three-dimensional space [J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2020, 17(1): 1-11.
[50] Hicheur H, Chauvin A, Cavin V, et al. Augmented-feedback training improves cognitive motor performance of soccer players [J]. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2020, 52(1): 141-152.
[51] Villiger M, Bohli D, Kiper D, et al. Virtual reality-augmented neurorehabilitation improves motor function and reduces neuropathic pain in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury[J]. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2013, 27(8):675-683.
[52] Limanowski J, Kirilina E, Blankenburg F. Neuronal correlates of continuous manual tracking under varying visual movement feedback in a virtual reality environment [J]. Neuroimage, 2017, 146:81-89.
[53] Helmer RJN, Farrow D, Ball K, et al. A pilot evaluation of an electronic textile for lower limb monitoring and interactive biofeedback [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 13: 513-518.
[54] Riskowski JL, Mikesky AE, Bahamonde RE, et al. Design and validation of a knee brace with feedback to reduce the rate of loading [J]. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2009, 131(8):84503.
[55] Huet M, Camachon C, Fernandez L, et al. Self-controlled concurrent feedback and the education of attention towards perceptual invariants[J]. Human Movement Science, 2009, 28(4):450-467.
[56] Letafatkar A, Rabiei P, Farivar N, et al. Long‐term efficacy of conditioning training program combined with feedback on kinetics and kinematics in male runners[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2020, 30(3): 429-441.
[57] Duschau-Wicke A, von Zitzewitz J, Caprez A, et al. Path control: A method for patient-cooperative robot-aided gait rehabilitation [J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2010, 18(1): 38-48.
[58] Van Beers RJ. Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise [J]. Neuron, 2009, 63(3): 406-417.
[59] Fleury M, Lioi G, Barillot C, et al. A Survey on the use of haptic feedback for brain-computer interfaces and neurofeedback [J]. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2020, 14: 528.
[60] Serrada I, Hordacre B, Hillier SL. Does sensory retraining improve sensation and sensorimotor function following stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Frontiers inNeuroscience, 2019, 13: 402.
[61] Marchal-Crespo L, Tsangaridis P, Obwegeser D, et al. Haptic error modulation outperforms visual error amplification when learning a modified gait pattern [J]. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2019, 13: 61.
[62] 孙浩浩.面向智能终端的触觉再现系统和建模方法研究[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2018.
[63] 许恒. 基于电触觉刺激的感知反馈系统研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2015.
[64] Seitz AR, Dinse HR. A common framework for perceptual learning [J]. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2007, 17(2): 148-153.
[65] Shams L, Seitz AR. Benefits of multisensory learning [J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2008, 12(11): 411-417.
[66] Hecht D, Reiner M, Karni A. Enhancement of response times to bi-and tri-modal sensory stimuli during active movements [J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2008, 185(4): 655-665.
[67] Kondo T, Saeki M, Hayashi Y, et al. Effect of instructive visual stimuli on neurofeedback training for motor imagery-based brain-computer interface [J]. Human Movement Science, 2015, 43: 239-249.
[68] Eriksson M, Halvorsen KA, Gullstrand L. Immediate effect of visual and auditory feedback to control the running mechanics of well-trained athletes [J]. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2011, 29(3): 253-262.
[69] Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion [J]. Nature, 2002, 415 (6870): 429-433.
[70] Cervera MA, Soekadar SR, Ushiba J, et al. Brain-computer interfaces for post-stroke motor rehabilitation: A meta-analysis [J]. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, 2018, 5(5):651-663.
[71] Friesen CL, Bardouille T, Neyedli HF, et al. Combined action observation and motor imagery neurofeedback for modulation of brain activity [J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2016, 10: 692.
[72] Neuper C, Scherer R, Wriessnegger S, et al. Motor imagery and action observation: Modulation of sensorimotor brain rhythms during mental control of a brain-computer interface [J]. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2009, 120(2): 239-247.
[73] Vukelic M, Gharabaghi A. Oscillatory entrainment of the motor cortical network during motor imagery is modulated by the feedback modality [J]. NeuroImage, 2015, 111:1-11
[74] Ono Y, Wada K, Kurata M, et al. Enhancement of motor-imagery ability via combined action observation and motor-imagery training with proprioceptive neurofeedback [J]. Neuropsychologia, 2018, 114:134-142.
[75] Ramos-Murguialday A, Broetz D, Rea M, et al. Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study [J]. Annals of Neurology, 2013, 74(1): 100-108.
[76] Pichiorri F, Morone G, Petti M, et al. Brain-computer interface boosts motor imagery practice during stroke recovery: BCI and Motor Imagery [J]. Annals of Neurology, 2015, 77(5): 851-865.
[77] Raffin E, Hummel FC. Restoring motor functions after stroke: multiple approaches and opportunities [J]. The Neuroscientist, 2018, 24(4): 400-416.