|
|
|
| Large-Scale Brain Networks Interactions Support Internal and External Directed Cognition |
| Xin Fei1 , Xie Chao2, Wang Lijun3, Lei Xu4* |
1(The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China)
2(Key Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience and Brain-Inspired Intelligence of Ministry of Education, Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)
3(Institute of Cognition, Brain and Health, Key Laboratory for Psychology and Behavior of Henan Province, Institute of Education Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, Henan, China)
4(Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Converging evidence has indicated that the high-level cognitive functions are carried out through the dynamic interactions among large-scale brain networks instead of stand-alone brain regions. Among them, the frontoparietal control network plays a pivotal gate-keeping role in goal-directed cognition, modulating the dynamic balance between the dorsal attention network and the default network. The present article reviewed the advances of this field from several aspects, including the neuroanatomy of the default network, the dorsal attention network and the frontoparietal control network, as well as their respective functional roles and dynamic interactions in the internal- and external- directed attention tasks. Future research needs to further explore the functional roles of the subsystems within each network and uses the effective connectivity method to examine the direction and dynamics of the information transmission within- and between- networks.
|
|
Received: 05 June 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Bressler SL, Menon V. Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles [J]. Trends Cogn Sci, 2010, 14(6): 277-290.
[2] Gao Wei, Lin Weili. Frontal parietal control network regulates the anti-correlated default and dorsal attention networks [J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2012, 33(1): 192-202.
[3] Spreng RN, Stevens WD, Chamberlain JP, et al. Default network activity, coupled with the frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition [J]. Neuroimage, 2010, 53(1): 303-317.
[4] Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, et al. A default mode of brain function [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98(2): 676-682.
[5] Raichle ME. The Brain's Default Mode Network [J]. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2015, 38(1): 433-447.
[6] Wen Xiaotong, Liu Yijun, Yao Li, et al. Top-down regulation of default mode activity in spatial visual attention [J]. J Neurosci, 2013, 33(15): 6444-6453.
[7] Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease [J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2008, 1124: 1-38.
[8] Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102(27): 9673-9678.
[9] Marek S, Dosenbach NUF. The frontoparietal network: Function, electrophysiology, and importance of individual precision mapping [J]. Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 2018, 20(2): 133-140.
[10] Dosenbach NU, Fair DA, Miezin FM, et al. Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104(26): 11073-11078.
[11] Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF, et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control [J]. J Neurosci, 2007, 27.
[12] Ptak R. The frontoparietal attention network of the human brain: action, saliency, and a priority map of the environment [J]. Neuroscientist, 2012, 18(5): 502-515.
[13] Scolari M, Seidl-Rathkopf KN, Kastner S. Functions of the human frontoparietal attention network: Evidence from neuroimaging [J]. Curr Opin Behav Sci, 2015, 1: 32-39.
[14] Shirer WR, Ryali S, Rykhlevskaia E, et al. Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns [J]. Cereb Cortex, 2012, 22(1): 158-165.
[15] Dosenbach NU, Fair DA, Cohen AL, et al. A dual-networks architecture of top-down control [J]. Trends Cogn Sci, 2008, 12(3): 99-105.
[16] Cole MW, Reynolds JR, Power JD, et al. Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control [J]. Nat Neurosci, 2013, 16(9): 1348-1355.
[17] Vincent JL, Kahn I, Snyder AZ, et al. Evidence for a frontoparietal control system revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity [J]. J Neurophysiol, 2008, 100(6): 3328-3342.
[18] Spreng RN, Sepulcre J, Turner GR, et al. Intrinsic architecture underlying the relations among the default, dorsal attention, and frontoparietal control networks of the human brain [J]. J Cogn Neurosci, 2013, 25(1): 74-86.
[19] Power JD, Cohen AL, Nelson SM, et al. Functional network organization of the human brain [J]. Neuron, 2011, 72(4): 665-678.
[20] Dixon ML, Andrews-Hanna JR, Spreng RN, et al. Interactions between the default network and dorsal attention network vary across default subsystems, time, and cognitive states [J]. Neuroimage, 2017, 147: 632-649.
[21] Buckner RL, DiNicola LM. The brains default network: updated anatomy, physiology and evolving insights [J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2019, 20(10): 593-608.
[22] Spreng RN, Grady CL. Patterns of brain activity supporting autobiographical memory, prospection, and theory of mind, and their relationship to the default mode network [J]. J Cogn Neurosci, 2010, 22(6): 1112-1123.
[23] Andrews-Hanna JR. The brain's default network and its adaptive role in internal mentation [J]. Neuroscientist, 2012, 18(3): 251-270.
[24] Vatansever D, Menon DK, Stamatakis EA. Default mode contributions to automated information processing [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2017, 114(48): 12821.
[25] Weissman D, Roberts K, Visscher K, et al. The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention [J]. Nat Neurosci, 2006, 9(7): 971-978.
[26] Anticevic A, Cole MW, Murray JD, et al. The role of default network deactivation in cognition and disease [J]. Trends Cogn Sci, 2012, 16(12): 584-592.
[27] Anticevic A, Repovs G, Barch DM. Working memory encoding and maintenance deficits in schizophrenia: neural evidence for activation and deactivation abnormalities [J]. Schizophr Bull, 2013, 39(1): 168-178.
[28] Mulders PC, van Eijndhoven PF, Schene AH, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity in major depressive disorder: A review [J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2015, 56: 330-344.
[29] Kaiser RH, Andrews-Hanna JR, Wager TD, et al. Large-scale network dysfunction in major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity [J]. JAMA Psychiatry, 2015, 72(6): 603-611.
[30] Menon V. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: A unifying triple network model [J]. Trends Cogn Sci, 2011, 15(10): 483-506.
[31] Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain [J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2002, 3(3): 201-215.
[32] Fox MD, Corbetta M, Snyder AZ, et al. Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006, 103(26): 10046-10051.
[33] Corbetta M, Patel G, Shulman GL. The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind [J]. Neuron, 2008, 58(3): 306-324.
[34] Vossel S, Geng JJ, Fink GR. Dorsal and ventral attention systems: distinct neural circuits but collaborative roles [J]. Neuroscientist, 2014, 20(2): 150-159.
[35] Cole MW, Schneider W. The cognitive control network: Integrated cortical regions with dissociable functions [J]. Neuroimage, 2007, 37(1): 343-360.
[36] Smallwood J, Brown K, Baird B, et al. Cooperation between the default mode network and the frontal-parietal network in the production of an internal train of thought [J]. Brain Res, 2012, 1428: 60-70.
[37] Campbell KL, Grady CL, Ng C, et al. Age differences in the frontoparietal cognitive control network: implications for distractibility [J]. Neuropsychologia, 2012, 50(9): 2212-2223.
[38] Dosenbach NU, Visscher KM, Palmer ED, et al. A core system for the implementation of task sets [J]. Neuron, 2006, 50(5): 799-812.
[39] Spreng RN, Schacter DL. Default network modulation and large-scale network interactivity in healthy young and old adults [J]. Cereb Cortex, 2011, 22(11): 2610-2621.
[40] Newton AT, Morgan VL, Rogers BP, et al. Modulation of steady state functional connectivity in the default mode and working memory networks by cognitive load [J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2011, 32(10): 1649-1659.
[41] Xin Fei, Lei Xu. Competition between frontoparietal control and default networks supports social working memory and empathy [J]. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2015, 10(8): 1144-1152.
[42] Gordon EM, Stollstorff M, Devaney JM, et al. Effect of dopamine transporter genotype on intrinsic functional connectivity depends on cognitive state [J]. Cereb Cortex, 2012, 22(9): 2182-2196.
[43] Sambataro F, Murty VP, Callicott JH, et al. Age-related alterations in default mode network: impact on working memory performance [J]. Neurobiol Aging, 2010, 31(5): 839-852.
[44] Ossandon T, Jerbi K, Vidal JR, et al. Transient suppression of broadband gamma power in the default-mode network is correlated with task complexity and subject performance [J]. J Neurosci, 2011, 31(41): 14521-14530.
[45] Gerlach KD, Spreng RN, Madore KP, et al. Future planning: default network activity couples with frontoparietal control network and reward-processing regions during process and outcome simulations [J]. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2014, 9(12): 1942-1951.
[46] Gerlach KD, Spreng RN, Gilmore AW, et al. Solving future problems: default network and executive activity associated with goal-directed mental simulations [J]. Neuroimage, 2011, 55(4): 1816-1824.
[47] Beaty RE, Benedek M, Kaufman SB, et al. Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production [J]. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 10964.
[48] Beaty RE, Benedek M, Silvia PJ, et al. Creative cognition and brain network dynamics [J]. Trends Cogn Sci, 2016, 20(2): 87-95.
[49] Shi Liang, Sun Jiangzhou, Xia Yunman, et al. Large-scale brain network connectivity underlying creativity in resting-state and task fMRI: Cooperation between default network and frontal-parietal network [J]. Biol Psychol, 2018, 135: 102-111.
[50] Fornito A, Harrison BJ, Zalesky A, et al. Competitive and cooperative dynamics of large-scale brain functional networks supporting recollection [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109(31): 12788-12793.
[51] Christoff K, Gordon AM, Smallwood J, et al. Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106(21): 8719-8724.
[52] Fox KC, Spreng RN, Ellamil M, et al. The wandering brain: meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of mind-wandering and related spontaneous thought processes [J]. Neuroimage, 2015, 111: 611-621.
[53] Mooneyham BW, Mrazek MD, Mrazek AJ, et al. States of mind: Characterizing the neural bases of focus and mind-wandering through dynamic functional connectivity [J]. J Cogn Neurosci, 2017, 29(3): 495-506.
[54] Smallwood J, Schooler JW. The science of mind wandering: empirically navigating the stream of consciousness [J]. Annu Rev Psychol, 2015, 66: 487-518.
[55] Meyer ML, Spunt RP, Berkman ET, et al. Evidence for social working memory from a parametric functional MRI study [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109(6): 1883-1888.
[56] Mars RB, Neubert FX, Noonan MP, et al. On the relationship between the “default mode network“and the “social brain”[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2012, 6: 189.
[57] Koshino H, Minamoto T, Yaoi K, et al. Coactivation of the default mode network regions and working memory network regions during task preparation [J]. Sci Rep, 2014, 4: 5954.
[58] Kam JWY, Lin JJ, Solbakk AK, et al. Default network and frontoparietal control network theta connectivity supports internal attention [J]. Nat Hum Behav, 2 Sept, 2019 [Epub ahead of print].
[59] Yeo BT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J, et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity [J]. J Neurophysiol, 2011, 106(3): 1125-1165.
[60] Zabelina DL, Andrews-Hanna JR. Dynamic network interactions supporting internally-oriented cognition [J]. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2016, 40: 86-93.
[61] Maillet D, Beaty RE, Kucyi A, et al. Large-scale network interactions involved in dividing attention between the external environment and internal thoughts to pursue two distinct goals [J]. Neuroimage, 2019, 197: 49-59.
[62] Murphy K, Fox MD. Towards a consensus regarding global signal regression for resting state functional connectivity MRI [J]. Neuroimage, 2017, 154: 169-173.
[63] Murphy K, Birn RM, Bandettini PA. Resting-state FMRI confounds and cleanup [J]. Neuroimage, 2013, 80(1): 349-359.
[64] Desjardins AE, Kiehl KA, Liddle PF. Removal of confounding effects of global signal in functional MRI analyses [J]. Neuroimage, 2001, 13(4): 751-758.
[65] Macey PM, Macey KE, Kumar R, et al. A method for removal of global effects from fMRI time series [J]. Neuroimage, 2004, 22(1): 360.
[66] Wong CW, Olafsson V, Tal O, et al. The amplitude of the resting-state fMRI global signal is related to EEG vigilance measures [J]. Neuroimage, 2013, 83: 983-990.
[67] Wong CW, Olafsson V, Tal O, et al. Anti-correlated networks, global signal regression, and the effects of caffeine in resting-state functional MRI [J]. Neuroimage, 2012, 63(1): 356-364.
[68] Li Jingwei, Bolt T, Bzdok D, et al. Topography and behavioral relevance of the global signal in the human brain [J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 14286.
[69] Murphy K, Birn RM, Handwerker DA, et al. The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced? [J]. Neuroimage, 2009, 44(3): 893-905.
[70] Buckner RL. The brain's default network: origins and implications for the study of psychosis [J]. Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 2013, 15(3): 351-358.
[71] Spreng RN. The fallacy of a "task-negative" network [J]. Front Psychol, 2012, 3: 145.
[72] Uddin LQ, Kelly AM, Biswal BB, et al. Functional connectivity of default mode network components: correlation, anticorrelation, and causality [J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009, 30(2): 625-637.
[73] Andrews-Hanna JR, Reidler JS, Sepulcre J, et al. Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain's default network [J]. Neuron, 2010, 65(4): 550-562.
[74] Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF, et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control [J]. J Neurosci, 2007, 27(9): 2349-2356.
[75] Cocchi L, Zalesky A, Fornito A, et al. Dynamic cooperation and competition between brain systems during cognitive control [J]. Trends Cogn Sci, 2013, 17(10): 493-501.
[76] Sridharan D, Levitin DJ, Menon V. A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2008, 105(34): 12569-12574.
[77] Wang Yifeng, Zhu Lixia, Zou Qijun, et al. Frequency dependent hub role of the dorsal and ventral right anterior insula [J]. Neuroimage, 2018, 165: 112-117.
[78] Dixon ML, De La Vega A, Mills C, et al. Heterogeneity within the frontoparietal control network and its relationship to the default and dorsal attention networks [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2018, 115(7): E1598-e1607.
[79] Friston KJ. Functional and effective connectivity: A review [J]. Brain Connect, 2011, 1(1): 13-36.
[80] Niendam TA, Laird AR, Ray KL, et al. Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions [J]. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, 2012, 12(2): 241-268. |
| [1] |
Bian Yan, Zhao Li, Fu Xing, Qi Hongzhi. Analysis of MI Brain Causal Networks Under Different Visual Stimuli Guidance[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2020, 39(6): 685-692. |
| [2] |
Liu Xiaoya, Liu Shuang, Guo Dongyue, An Xingwei, Yang Jiajia, Ming Dong. Research Progress in Electroencephalography of Depression[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2020, 39(3): 351-361. |
|
|
|
|
