大鼠海马神经元群体对于高频电刺激的响应

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-8021. 2014. 02.008

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (10)

全文: PDF (2526 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要脑深部电刺激（DBS）在帕金森和癫痫等疾病治疗中的应用不断发展，但DBS对于神经元的作用机制尚无定论。为了研究DBS对于大脑神经网络的作用，在麻醉大鼠海马CA1区的输入和输出轴突纤维上，分别施加正向和反向高频电刺激（HFS），考察CA1区锥体神经元的同步动作电位（即群峰电位）发放情况。结果表明，50 Hz的正向HFS可以诱发持续发放的群峰电位，而100和200 Hz的正向HFS诱发的群峰电位却要少得多。在不同频率的反向HFS中，每个刺激脉冲均诱发群峰电位，但它们的幅值逐渐减小；而且，刺激频率越高，幅值减小得越快。可见，作用于轴突的HFS对于上游和下游神经元群体都具有兴奋作用，但频率越高，兴奋作用越小。这些结果，对于深入了解DBS的作用机制以及安全有效地推广其临床应用都具有重要的意义。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	封洲燕^*余颖曹嘉悦郭哲杉

关键词 ：大脑深部电刺激, 高频电刺激, 海马, 群峰电位, 神经网络

Abstract：Deep brain stimulations (DBS) have been developed for treating brain diseases such as Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy. But the mechanisms underlying DBS are not clear yet. In order to study the effects of DBS on the neural networks of brain, both orthodromic and antidromichigh frequency stimulation (HFS) were respectively applied on afferent fibers and efferent fibers of the hippocampal CA1 region in anaesthetized rats. Synchronized firings of neuronal action potential (i.e., population spike, PS) of CA1 pyramidal cells were examined. Results showed that 50 Hz orthodromicHFS induced persistent PS firings, while 100 and 200 Hz orthodromicHFS induced much less PS firings. During antidromicHFS with different frequencies, every stimulation pulse evoked a PS. However, the PS amplitude decreased gradually. The decrease of PS amplitude was more rapid with higher stimulation frequency. Taken together, the HFS of axons has excitatory effects on the neuronal populations both upstream and downstream. But the higher the stimulation frequency is, the less the excitatory effect is. These results are important for the further understanding of DBS mechanisms and for the safe and effective application of DBS in clinic.

Key words： deep brain stimulation high frequency stimulation hippocampus population spike neural network

基金资助:国家自然科学基金（30970753）

引用本文:

封洲燕^*余颖曹嘉悦郭哲杉. 大鼠海马神经元群体对于高频电刺激的响应[J]. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2014, 33(2): 186-193.
FENG Zhou Yan^*YU Ying CAO Jia Yue GUO Zhe Shan. Response of Neuronal Population to High Frequency Electrical Stimulation in Rat Hippocampus. journal1, 2014, 33(2): 186-193.

链接本文:

http://cjbme.csbme.org/CN/10.3969/j.issn.0258-8021. 2014. 02.008 或 http://cjbme.csbme.org/CN/Y2014/V33/I2/186

［1］Hamani C, Andrade D, Hodaie M, et al. Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy ［J］. Int J Neural Syst, 2009, 19(3): 213-226.
［2］Kuhn J, Mller M, Müller U, et al. Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of addiction ［J］. Addiction, 2011, 106(8): 1536-1537.
［3］Mayberg HS, Lozano AM, Voon V, et al. Deep brain stimulation for treatmentresistant depression ［J］. Neuron, 2005, 45(5): 651-660.
［4］Boon P, Vonck K, De Herdt V, et al. Deep brain stimulation in patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy［J］. Epilepsia, 2007, 48(8): 1551-1560.
［5］Jobst B. Brain stimulation for surgical epilepsy［J］. Epilepsy Res, 2010, 89(1): 154-161.
［6］Bragin A, Penttonen M, Buzsaki G. Termination of epileptic afterdischarge in the hippocampus ［J］. J Neurosci, 1997, 17(7): 2567-2579.
［7］Lee HW, Webber WR, Crone N, et al. When is electrical cortical stimulation more likely to produce afterdischarges［J］? Clin Neurophysiol, 2010, 121(1):14-20.
［8］Gwinn RP, Spencer DD. Fighting fire with fire: brain stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy ［J］. Clin Neurosci Res, 2004, 4(1): 95-105.
［9］Deniau JM, Degos B, Bosch C, et al. Deep brain stimulation mechanisms: beyond the concept of local functional inhibition［J］. Eur J Neurosci, 2010, 32(7): 1080-1091. 
［10］Feng Zhouyan, Zheng Xiaojing, Yu Ying, et al. Functional disconnection of axonal fibers generated by high frequency stimulation in the hippocampal CA1 region invivo［J］. Brain Res, 2013, 1509: 32-42.
［11］封洲燕, 肖乾江, 胡振华. 电刺激期间神经细胞单元锋电位的检测［J］. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2013, 32(4):403-410.
［12］封洲燕, 邢昊昱, 田聪, 等. 大鼠海马 CA1 区前馈抑制和反馈抑制的作用特性［J］. 航天医学与医学工程, 2011, 24(3): 167-172.
［13］McCarren M, Alger BE. Usedependent depression of IPSPs in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells in vitro［J］. J Neurophysiol, 1985, 53(2): 557-571.
［14］Pearce RA, Grunder SD, Faucher LD. Different mechanisms for usedependent depression of two GABAAmediated IPSCs in rat hippocampus［J］. J Physiol, 1995, 484(Pt 2): 425-435.
［15］Théorêt Y, Brown A, Fleming SP, et al. Hippocampal field potential: a microcomputer aided comparison of amplitude and integral［J］. Brain Res Bull, 1984, 12(5): 589-595.［16］Freund T, Buzsaki G. Interneurons of the hippocampus［J］. Hippocampus, 1996, 6(4): 347-470.
［17］Margineanu DG, Wulfert E. Differential pairedpulse effects of gabazine and bicuculline in rat hippocampal CA3 area［J］. Brain Res Bull, 2000, 51(1): 69-74. 
［18］Leung LS, Peloquin P, Canning KJ. Pairedpulse depression of excitatory postsynaptic current sinks in hippocampal CA1 in vivo ［J］. Hippocampus, 2008, 18(10): 1008-1020.
［19］Davies CH, Davies SN, Collingridge GL. Pairedpulse depression of monosynaptic GABAmediated inhibitory postsynaptic responses in rat hippocampus［J］. J Physiol, 1990, 424: 513-531. 
［20］Jensen AL, Durand DM. High frequency stimulation can block axonal conduction［J］. Exp Neurol, 2009, 220(1): 57-70.
［21］Zheng Fang, Lammert K, NixdorfBergweiler BE, et al. Axonal failure during high frequency stimulation of rat subthalamic nucleus［J］. J Physiol, 2011, 589(Pt 11): 2781-2793.
［22］Kim E, Owen B, Holmes WR, et al. Decreased afferent excitability contributes to synaptic depression during highfrequency stimulation in hippocampal area CA1［J］. J Neurophysiol, 2012, 108(7): 1965-1976.
［23］Ratas I, Pyragas K. Effect of highfrequency stimulation on nerve pulse propagation in the FitzHugh-Nagumo model［J］. Nonlinear Dyn, 2012, 67(4): 2899-2908.
［24］Sceniak MP, MacIver MB. Cellular actions of urethane on rat visual cortical neurons in vitro［J］. J Neurophysiol, 2006, 95(6): 3865-3874.