Quantitative Measurement of 3D Skin Wound Area Based on Single Camera
Liu Chunhui1, Fan Yubo1,3*, Xu Yan1,2*
1School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering,BUAA, State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment and Key Laboratory of Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education and Research Institute of Beihang University in Shenzhen, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering,Beijing 100191, China; 2Microsoft Research, Beijing 100080, China; 3National Research Center for Rehabilitation Technical Aids,Beijing100176, China
Abstract：The measurement of skin wounds is an important work in the field of clinical research and forensic identification. Quantitative measurement of skin wounds area has important significance in forensic identification, clinical trials, the wound pathological analysis and daily patient care. In this paper, the algorithm of structure from motion (SFM) and least squares conformal mapping (LSCM) were introduced into the measurement of skin wounds area, combined with image segmentation, an algorithm that suitable for the area measurement of the human body surface was proposed. This paper used eigenvalue extraction, sparse reconstruction and dense reconstruction in order to get the 3D point cloud of the tested body. Then the paper used the Poisson reconstruction algorithm on the point to make them networked, and unwrap the UV map of the 3D model for skin wounds extraction and measurement in the end. This paper used the known area simulation wound as a benchmark, 40 groups were adopted to evaluate the accuracy of the algorithm. The measuring accuracy of the experimental results showed that the algorithm in this paper reached the accuracy of 0.97, compared with 2D measurement method, the accuracy was increased by 10.79%. The algorithm in this paper solved the shortcoming of the contact method and the problem of human curvature or angle deflection, which was hard to solve by the 2D measurement. In addition, the algorithm in this paper has less dependence of equipment and high accuracy especially in the parts with large curvature.
刘春晖 ,樊瑜波 ,许燕. 基于单摄像头的三维体表损伤面积定量测量方法[J]. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2018, 37(1): 40-48.
Liu Chunhui, Fan Yubo, Xu Yan. Quantitative Measurement of 3D Skin Wound Area Based on Single Camera. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2018, 37(1): 40-48.
[1] Lavery LA, Vames SA, Keith MS et al. Prediction of healing for postoperative diabetic foot wounds based on early wound area progression [J]. Diabetes Care, 2008, 31(1): 26-29. [2] Coerper S, Kuper MA, Jekov M, et al. Fifty percent area reduction after 4 weeks of treatments is a reliable indicator for healing\|Analysis of a single-center cohort of 704 diabetic patients [J]. J Diabetes Complications, 2009, 23(1):49-53. [3] 最高人民法院,最高人民检察院, 公安部, 等. 人体损伤鉴定标准[S]. 北京,2013. [4] 樊瑜波,蒲放,于晓军,等.人体体表损伤相对面积法医学鉴定计算机辅助系统的研制[J].生物医学工程学杂志,1999,16(4):445-447. [5] 最高人民法院, 最高人民检察院, 公安部, 等. 人体损伤致残程度分级[S].北京,2016. [6] Cardinal M, Eisenbud DE, Phillips T, et al. Early healing rates and wound area measurements are reliable predictors of later complete wound closure [J]. Wound Repair Regen, 2008, 16(1):19-22. [7] 付小兵,孙同柱,盛志勇.几种用于创伤修复研究的动物模型[J].中华实验外科杂志,1999,16(5):479-480. [8] Langemo D, Anderson J, Hanson D, et al. Measuring wound length, width, and area: which technique? [J].Adv Skin Wound Care, 2008, 21:42-45. [9] Shetty R, Strrkar H, Lamba S, et al. A novel and accurate techniqu,e of photographic wound measurement [J]. Indian J Plast Surg, 2012, 45(2): 425-429. [10] Gethin G, Cowman S. Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry [J]. J Clin Nurs, 2006, 15:422-427. [11] Kundin JI. Designing and developing a new measuring instrument [J]. Perioper Nurs Q, 1985, 1(4):40-45 [12] Piotr F, Piotr L, Stanislawa S, et al. Accuracy and precision of selected wound area measurement methods in diabetic food ulceration [J]. Diabets Technology & Therapeutics, 2013, 8(15):711-720. [13] Plassmann P, Jones TD. A non-invasive instrument to measure area and volume of wounds measurement of area and volume instrument system [J]. Medical Engineering & Physics, 1998, 20(5):332-338. [14] Rogers LC, Bevilacqua NJ, Armstrong DG, et al. Digital planimetry results in more accurate wound measurements: a comparison to standard ruler measurement [J]. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2010, 4(4):799-802. [15] 张必明.基于计算机视觉的体表三维测量技术研究[D].长沙:中南大学,2006. [16] 陈颀.基于计算机视觉的法医学体表损伤测量研究[D].北京:北京航空航天大学,2012. [17] Tomasic C, Kanade T. Shape and motion from image stream under orthography: a factorization method[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1992, 9(2):137-154. [18] Fisher Y, David G. 3D reconstruction from accidental motion [C]//Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition, Columbus:IEEE,2014:3986-3993. [19] Michael K, Matthew B, Hugues H. Poisson surface reconstruction [C]//Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing. Eurographics, 2006:61-70. [20] Levy B, Petitjean S, Ray N, et al. Least squares conformal maps for automatic texture atlas generation [J]. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 2002, 21(3):362-371. [21] Haker S, Angenent S, Tannenbaum A, et al. Conformal surface parameterization for texture mapping [J]. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph, 2004, 6(2):1-9. [22] Akshay G, Rithvik S, Alex NJR, et al. Efficient wound measurements using RGB and depth images [J]. International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, 2015, 18(4):333-358. [23] David GL. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints [J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2):91-110. [24] Kong SG, Heo J, Boughorbel F, et al. Multiscale fusion of visible and thermal IR images for illumination-invariant face recognition [J]. Int J Computer Vision, 2007, 71:215-233. [25] Tomasi C, Kanade T. Detection and tracking of point features [R]. Tech Rep CMU-CS-91-132, Carnegie Mellon University, 1991. [26] Parvizi D, Giretzlehne M, Wurzer P, et al.BurnCase 3D software validation study: Burn size measurement accuracy and inter-rater reliability [J]. Burns, 2016, 42(2):329-335. [27] 姚砺, 程彦荣,吴欢. 基于网格模型的三维区域面积测量[J]. 软件导刊, 2016, 2:98-101. [28] DS EN60825-1-2014, Safety of Laser Products-Part 1: Equipment Classification and Requirements[S]
