电刺激期间神经细胞单元锋电位的检测

doi:10》3969/j.issn.0258-8021. 2013 0404

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (2)

全文: PDF (1204 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要大脑深部电刺激（DBS）已成功用于临床治疗帕金森等中枢神经系统疾病；但是DBS的作用机制尚无定论。为了考察电刺激期间神经细胞动作电位（即单元锋电位）发放的规律，本研究设计了一种插值法去除刺激伪迹和大幅值诱发波，并设定信号斜率的阈值来自动选定插值区的端点，尽可能缩短锋电位的不可测期（NP）。该算法用于大鼠海马CA1区正向和反向电刺激期间锋电位的分析，结果表明：它可以将紧随刺激的NP缩短约8 ms；而且与线性插值相比，样条插值对于锋电位检测的影响更小。此插值法能够有效地用于高频串刺激期间锋电位信号的检测，从而为深入研究DBS期间的神经元活动提供了一种简单实用的新方法。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	封洲燕^*肖乾江胡振华

关键词 ：大脑深部电刺激, 伪迹, 群峰电位, 单元锋电位

Abstract：Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been used to treat disorders in clinical practice, such as Parkinson’s disease of central nervous system. However, the mechanisms of DBS are not clear yet. In order to investigate the changes of action potential (i.e., unit spike) firings of individual neurons during the periods of electrical stimulation, we designed an interpolation method to remove stimulation artifacts together with evoked potentials with large amplitudes. Thresholds of signal slope were used to determine the end points of interpolation segment thereby minimizing the nonusable period (NP) of spike detection. The method was used to analyze the spike activity during either orthodromic or antidromic stimulation of hippocampal CA1 region in rat brain. Results showed that the NP immediately following stimulation could be shortened by ～8 ms using the method. A further decrease of the influence was achieved by using spline interpolation instead of linear interpolation. The novel method can be used to detect spike signals during the periods of high frequency stimulation efficiently, providing a simple and practicable method to investigate the neuronal activity during DBS.

Key words： deep brain stimulation artifact population spike unit spike

基金资助:国家自然科学基金（30970753）

引用本文:

封洲燕^*肖乾江胡振华. 电刺激期间神经细胞单元锋电位的检测[J]. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2013, 32(4): 403-410.
FENG Zhou Yan^* XIAO Qian Jiang HU Zhen Hua. Detecting Neuronal Unit Spikes during Electrical Stimulation Periods. journal1, 2013, 32(4): 403-410.

链接本文:

http://cjbme.csbme.org/CN/10》3969/j.issn.0258-8021. 2013 0404 或 http://cjbme.csbme.org/CN/Y2013/V32/I4/403

［1］Montgomery EB Jr, Gale JT. Mechanisms of action of deep brain stimulation (DBS)［J］. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2008, 32(3): 388-407.
［2］Kuhn J, Mller M, Müller U, et al. Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of addiction［J］. Addiction, 2011, 106(8): 1536-1537.
［3］Datta A, Baker JM, Bikson M, et al. Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial directcurrent stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient［J］. Brain Stimul, 2011, 4(3): 169-174.
［4］Buzsaki G. Largescale recording of neuronal ensembles［J］. Nat Neurosci, 2004, 7(5): 446-451.
［5］Erez Y, Tischler H, Moran A, et al. Generalized framework for stimulus artifact removal［J］. J Neurosci Methods, 2010, 191(1): 45-59. 
［6］Wagenaar DA, Potter SM. Realtime multichannel stimulus artifact suppression by local curve fitting［J］, J Neurosci Methods, 2002, 120(2): 113-120.
［7］Nam Y, Brown EA, Ross JD, et al. A retrofitted neural recording system with a novel stimulation IC to monitor early neural responses from a stimulating electrode［J］. J Neurosci Methods, 2009, 178(1): 99-102.
［8］Kloosterman F, Peloquin P, Leung LS. Apical and basal orthodromic population spikes in hippocampal CA1 in vivo show different origins and patterns of propagation［J］. J Neurophysiol, 2001, 86 (5): 2435-2444.
［9］封洲燕, 光磊, 郑晓静, 等. 应用线性硅电极阵列检测海马场电位和单细胞动作电位［J］. 生物化学与生物物理进展, 2007, 34(4): 401-407.
［10］Takekawa T, Isomura Y, Fukai T. Accurate spike sorting for multiunit recordings［J］. Eur J Neurosci, 2010, 31(2): 263-272.
［11］Kaneko H, Suzuki SS, Okada J, et al. Multineuronal spike classification based on multisite electrode recording, wholewaveform analysis, and hierarchical clustering［J］. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 1999, 46(3): 280-290.
［12］Heffer LF, Fallon JB. A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for highrate electrical stimulation［J］. J Neurosci Methods, 2008, 170(2): 277-284. 
［13］Winchman, T. A digital averaging method for the removal of stimulus artifacts in neurophysiologic experiments［J］. J Neurosci Methods, 2000, 98(1): 57–62.
［14］Hashimoto T, Elder CM, Vitek JL. A template subtraction method for stimulus artifact removal in highfrequency deep brain stimulation［J］. J Neurosci Methods, 2002, 113(2): 181-186. 
［15］封洲燕, 王静, 汪洋, 等. 神经元锋电位信号滤波频率的选择［J］. 浙江大学学报工学版, 2012, 46 (2): 351-358. 
［16］Dunn S, Constantinides A, Moghe PV, 封洲燕译. 数值方法在生物医学工程中的应用［M］. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2009: 317-324.
［17］Brown EA, Ross JD, Blum RA, et al. StimulusArtifact Elimination in a MultiElectrode System［J］. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst, 2008, 2(1): 10-21.
［18］Montgomery EB, Gale J, Huang H. Methods for isolating extracellular action potentials and removing stimulus artifacts from microelectrode recordings of neurons requiring minimal operator intervention［J］. J Neurosci Methods, 2005, 144(1): 107-125. 
［19］Wichmann T, Devergnas A. A novel device to suppress electrical stimulus artifacts in electrophysiological experiments［J］. J Neurosci Methods, 2011, 201(1): 1-8.