|
|
|
| Research Progress of Degradable Behavior of Absorbable Biomaterials in Bone Repair |
| Ma Jing1,2, Su Xiuyun1, Tang Bin2, Wang Lin1,3*, Pei Guoxian1,3* |
1(Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China)
2(Department of Biomedical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China)
3(School of Medicine, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Degradable orthopedic implants have attracted intensive attention of clinicians and researchers because the application of these implants can avoid the secondary surgery for implant removal after bone repair and the problem of inflammation of permanent implants. However, the inherent properties of biomaterials of the implants, such as degradation rate, mechanical strength, and osteogenic ability, may hinder their clinical translational applications. To solve the bottleneck, many efforts have been made to the regulation of the degradation behavior and osteogenic capacity of biomaterials via coating bioactive materials, optimizing crystal structure or porous structure and doping functional small molecules. Based on the latest research literatures, this review focused on the degradation mechanism of the degradable biomaterials (including metals, ceramics, natural polymers, and synthetic polymers), the regulation methods of their degradation behavior as well as the effects on their mechanical properties and ability of bone regeneration, aiming to provide a comprehensive reference for developing novel biodegradable orthopedic implants whose degradation behavior depend on the formation of new bone.
|
|
Received: 02 June 2022
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
*E-mail: wangl7@sustech.edu.cn;peigx@sustech.edu.cn
|
|
|
|
[1] Koons GL, Diba M, Mikos AG. Materials design for bone-tissue engineering[J]. Nat Rev Mater, 2020, 5 (8): 584-603.
[2] Chandra G, Pandey A. Biodegradable bone implants in orthopedic applications: a review[J]. Biocybern Biomed Eng, 2020, 40 (2): 596-610.
[3] Sezer N, Evis Z, Ko M. Additive manufacturing of biodegradablemagnesium implants and scaffolds: review of the recent advances and research trends[J]. J Magnes Alloy, 2021, 9: 392-415.
[4] 樊光娆,苏海军,郭敏,等. 生物陶瓷支架促进再生组织血管生成和骨生成的研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2021, 35 (1): 1096-1104.
[5] Sabir MI, Xu Xiaoxue, Li Li. A review on biodegradable polymeric materials for bone tissue engineering applications[J]. J Mater Sci, 2009, 44: 5713-5724.
[6] Han HS, Loffredo S, Jun I, et al. Current status and outlook on the clinical translation of biodegradable metals[J]. Mater Today, 2019, 23: 57-71.
[7] Li Chunmei, Guo Chengchen, Fitzpatrick V, et al. Design of biodegradable, implantable devices towards clinical translation[J]. Nat Rev Mater, 2020, 5 (1): 61-81.
[8] Jia Gaozhi, Chen Chenxin, Zhang Jian, et al. In vitro degradation behavior of Mg scaffolds with three-dimensional interconnected porous structures for bone tissue engineering[J]. Corros Sci, 2018, 144: 301-312.
[9] Wang Yinchuan, Huang Hua, Jia Gaozhi, et al. Fatigue and dynamic biodegradation behavior of additively manufactured Mg scaffolds[J]. Acta Biomater, 2021, 135: 705-722.
[10] Dong Qiangsheng, Li Yang, Jiang Huiqin, et al. 3D-cubic interconnected porous Mg-based scaffolds for bone repair[J]. J Magnes Alloy, 2021, 9: 1329-1338.
[11] Jia Gaozhi, Zhou Meng, Huang Yicong, et al. Effects of dynamic flow rates on degradation deposition behavior of Mg scaffold[J]. J Magnes Alloy, 2021, 13: 33-40.
[12] Yan Yang, Chu Xin, Luo Xier, et al. A homogenous microstructural Mg-based matrix model for orthopedic application with generating uniform and smooth corrosion product layer in ringer’s solution: study on biodegradable behavior of Mg-Zn alloys prepared by powder metallurgy as a case[J]. J Magnes Alloy, 2021, 9 (1): 225-240.
[13] Fang Hui, Wang Chenxi, Zhou Shicheng, et al. Exploration of the enhanced performances for silk fibroin/sodium alginate composite coatings on biodegradable Mg-Zn-Ca alloy[J]. J Magnes Alloy, 2021, 9 (5): 1578-1594.
[14] Wang Chenxi, Fang Hui, Hang Chunjin, et al. Fabrication and characterization of silk fibroin coating on APTES pretreated Mg-Zn-Ca alloy[J]. Mater Sci Eng C, 2020, 110: 110742.
[15] Bonithon R, Lupton C, Roldo M, et al. Open-porous magnesium-based scaffolds withstand in-vitro corrosion under cyclic loading: A mechanistic study[J]. Bioact Mater, 2023, 19: 406-417.
[16] Xia Dandan, Qin Yu, Guo Hui, et al. Additively manufactured pure zinc porous scaffolds for critical-sized bone defects of rabbit femur[J]. Bioact Mater, 2023, 19: 12-23.
[17] Profeta AC, Prucher GM. Bioactive-glass in periodontal surgery and implant dentistry[J]. Dent Mater J, 2015, 34 (5): 559-571.
[18] Lu Chenpei, Wang Xudong, Shen Guofang. Bioceramics in bone tissue engineering[J]. Chinese J Tissue Eng Res, 2017, 21 (22): 3576-3582.
[19] Ahn JH, Kim J, Han G, et al. 3D-printed biodegradable composite scaffolds with significantly enhanced mechanical properties via the combination of binder jetting and capillary rise infiltration process[J]. Addit Manuf, 2021, 41: 101988.
[20] Hasan ML, Padalhin AR, Kim B, et al. Preparation and evaluation of BCP-CSD-agarose composite microsphere for bone tissue engineering[J]. J Biomed Mater Res-Part B Appl Biomater, 2019, 107 (7): 2263-2272.
[21] Demir-Oğuz Ö, Boccaccini AR, Loca D. Injectable bone cements: What benefits the combination of calcium phosphates and bioactive glasses could bring? [J]. Bioact Mater, 2023, 19: 217-236.
[22] Kim HS, Kumbar SG, Nukavarapu SP. Amorphous silica fiber matrix biomaterials: An analysis of material synthesis and characterization for tissue engineering[J]. Bioact Mater, 2023, 19: 155-166.
[23] Cui Penglei, Pan Panpan, Qin Ling, et al. Nanoengineered hydrogels as 3D biomimetic extracellular matrix with injectable and sustained delivery capability for cartilage regeneration[J]. Bioact Mater, 2023, 19: 487-498.
[24] Che Lingbin, Wang Ying, Sha Dongyong, et al. A biomimetic and bioactive scaffold with intelligently pulsatile teriparatide delivery for local and systemic osteoporosis regeneration[J]. Bioact Mater, 2023, 19: 75-87.
[25] Thitiset T, Damrongsakkul S, Yodmuang S, et al. A novel gelatin/chitooligosaccharide/demineralized bone matrix composite scaffold and periosteum-derived mesenchymal stem cells for bone tissue engineering[J]. Biomater Res, 2021, 25 (1): 1-11.
[26] Wei Qiang, Liu Dachuan, Chu Genglei, et al. TGF-Β1-supplemented decellularized annulus fibrosus matrix hydrogels promote annulus fibrosus repair[J]. Bioact Mater, 2023, 19: 581-593.
[27] Tateno A, Asano M, Akita D, et al. Transplantation of dedifferentiated fat cells combined with a biodegradable type I collagen-recombinant peptide scaffold for critical-size bone defects in rats[J]. J Oral Sci, 2019, 61 (4): 534-538.
[28] Yan Yufei, Cheng Baochang, Chen Kaizhe, et al. Enhanced osteogenesis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by a functionalized silk fibroin hydrogel for bone defect repair[J]. Adv Healthc Mater, 2019, 8 (3): 1-11.
[29] Liu Tao, Chen Yingrui, Lai Dongzhi, et al. Biomimetic fabrication of new bioceramics-introduced fibrous scaffolds: from physicochemical characteristics to in vitro biological properties[J]. Mater Sci Eng C, 2019, 94: 547-557.
[30] He Lizhe, Liu Xiaoling, Rudd C. Additive-manufactured gyroid scaffolds of magnesium oxide, phosphate glass fiber and polylac[J]. Polymers (Basel), 2021, 13 (2): 1-21.
[31] Flores-Sánchez MG, Islas-Arteaga NC, Raya-Rivera AM, et al. Effect of a plasma synthesized polypyrrole coverage on polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering[J]. J Biomed Mater Res-Part A, 2021, 109 (11): 2199-2211.
[32] Jaidev LR, Chatterjee K. Surface functionalization of 3D printed polymer scaffolds to augment stem cell response[J]. Mater Des, 2019, 161: 44-54.
[33] Mondal D, Lin Shigang, Rizkalla AS, et al. Porous and biodegradable polycaprolactone-borophosphosilicate hybrid scaffolds for osteoblast infiltration and stem cell differentiation[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2019, 92: 162-171.
[34] Xing Xin, Cheng Gu, Yin Chengcheng, et al. Magnesium-containing silk fibroin/polycaprolactone electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for accelerating bone regeneration[J]. Arab J Chem, 2020, 13 (5): 5526-5538.
[35] Yagci BS, Odabas S, Aksoy EA. Development of metformin chain extended polyurethane elastomers as bone regenerative films[J]. Eur J Pharm Sci, 2019, 131: 84-92.
[36] Wu Dongwei, Tan Jianwang, Yao Lingyun, et al. Customized composite intervertebral disc scaffolds by integrated 3D bioprinting for therapeutic implantation[J]. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf, 2021, 147: 106468.
[37] Murahashi Y, Yano F, Nakamoto H, et al. Multi-layered PLLA-nanosheets loaded with FGF-2 induce robust bone regeneration with controlled release in critical-sized mouse femoral defects[J]. Acta Biomater, 2019, 85: 172-179.
[38] Xu Hong, Qiu Yuyou, Xiong Zuogang, et al. Tracking mesenchymal stem cells with Ir(III) complex-encapsulated nanospheres in cranium defect with postmenopausal osteoporosis[J]. Mater Sci Eng C, 2021, 122: 111842.
[39] Tsai WB, Chen WT, Chien HW, et al. Poly(dopamine) coating to biodegradable polymers for bone tissue engineering[J]. J Biomater Appl, 2014, 28 (6): 837-848.
[40] Chen Xingyu, Lin Zaifu, Feng Ying, et al. Zwitterionic PMCP-modified polycaprolactone surface for tissue engineering: antifouling, cell adhesion promotion, and osteogenic differentiation properties[J]. Small, 2019, 15 (42): 1-11.
[41] Norouz F, Halabian R, Salimi A, et al. A new nanocomposite scaffold based on polyurethane and clay nanoplates for osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro[J]. Mater Sci Eng C, 2019, 103: 109857.
[42] Das R, Curry EJ, Le TT, et al. Biodegradable nanofiber bone-tissue scaffold as remotely-controlled and self-powering electrical stimulator[J]. Nano Energy, 2020, 76: 105028.
[43] Hao Lili, Li Jiaxiang, Wang Peng, et al. Spatiotemporal magnetocaloric microenvironment for guiding the fate of biodegradable polymer implants[J]. Adv Funct Mater, 2021, 31 (15): 1-11.
[44] Xia Dandan, Yang Fan, Zheng Yufeng, et al. Research status of biodegradable metals designed for oral and maxillofacial applications: a review[J]. Bioact Mater, 2021, 6 (11): 4186-4208.
[45] Zhang Lei, Jia Gaozhi, Tang Min, et al. Simultaneous enhancement of anti-corrosion, biocompatibility, and antimicrobial activities by hierarchically-structured brushite/Ag3PO4-coated Mg-based scaffold[J]. Mater Sci Eng C, 2020, 111: 110779.
[46] Qin Yu, Liu Aobo, Guo Hui, et al. Additive manufacturing of Zn-Mg alloy porous scaffolds with enhanced osseointegration: in vitro and in vivo studies[J]. Acta Biomater, 2022, 145: 403-415.
[47] Yang Hongtao, Wang Cong, Liu Chaoqing, et al. Evolution of the degradation mechanism of pure zinc stent in the one-year study of rabbit abdominal aorta model[J]. Biomaterials, 2017, 145: 92-105.
[48] Eugen G, Claus M, Anna-Maria S, et al. Degradation of 3D-printed magnesium phosphate ceramics in vitro and a prognosis on their bone regeneration potential[J]. Bioact Mater, 2023, 19: 376-391.
[49] 徐海伦, 满振涛, 李伟. 丝素蛋白生物支架在骨组织工程中的应用[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2020, 28 (23): 2165-2169.
[50] Luetchford KA, Chaudhuri JB, De Bank PA. Silk fibroin/gelatin microcarriers as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering[J]. Mater Sci Eng C, 2020, 106: 110116.
[51] Xia Pengfei, Zhang Kunxi, Yan Shifeng, et al. Biomimetic, biodegradable, and osteoinductive microgels with open porous structure and excellent injectability for construction of microtissues for bone tissue engineering[J]. Chem Eng J, 2021, 414: 128714.
[52] Li Yanli, Sun Si, Gao Pengcheng, et al. A tough chitosan-alginate porous hydrogel prepared by simple foaming method[J]. J Solid State Chem, 2021, 294: 121797.
[53] Ratanavaraporn J, Damrongsakkul S, Kanokpanont S, et al. Osteogenic differentiation of bone-marrow-derived stem cells cultured with mixed gelatin and chitooligosaccharide scaffolds[J]. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 2011, 22 (8): 1083-1098.
[54] Liu Zichen, Yu Baoqing. Development prospect and research value of biodegradable poly(lactic acid) for bone repair[J]. Chinese J Tissue Eng Res, 2021, 25 (34): 5552-5560.
[55] Backes EH, Fernandes EM, Diogo GS, et al. Engineering 3D printed bioactive composite scaffolds based on the combination of aliphatic polyester and calcium phosphates for bone tissue regeneration[J]. Mater Sci Eng C, 2021, 122: 111928.
[56] Shuai Cijun, Li Yang, Feng Pei, et al. Positive feedback effects of Mg on the hydrolysis of poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA): Promoted degradation of PLLA scaffold[J]. Polym Test, 2018, 68: 27-33.
[57] Dong Qiangsheng, Zhang Ming, Zhou Xingxing, et al. 3D-printed Mg-incorporated PCL-based scaffolds: a promising approach for bone healing[J]. Mater Sci Eng C, 2021, 129: 112372.
[58] Szczepańczyk P, Szlachta M, Złocista-Szewczyk N, et al. Recent developments in polyurethane-based materials for bone tissue engineering[J]. Polymers (Basel), 2021, 13(6): 946-982.
[59] Nilawar S and Chatterjee K. Olive oil-derived degradable polyurethanes for bone tissue regeneration[J]. Ind Crop Prod, 2022, 185: 115136. |
| [1] |
Chen Mu, Liu Wei, Liu Baolin. The Mechanism and Applications of Cryoablation for Tumor[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2023, 42(6): 757-768. |
| [2] |
Yang Shuyao, Xie Yuhai, Gong Yuchen, Liu Qiangqiang, Zhang Puming. Stereo-Electroencephalography Guided Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Prognosis Prediction Based on Brain Network Features of Patients with Refractory Epilepsy[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2023, 42(6): 651-658. |
|
|
|
|
