|
|
|
| Parameter Identification and Comparative Verification of Different COPD Respiratory MechanicsModels Based on Constrained Optimization Method |
| Xu Liqiang1,2#, Qiao Huiting1,2#, Zhang Chi1#, Xia Jingen3, Li Deyu1,4#* |
1(School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, National Medical Innovation Platform for Industry-Education Integration in Advanced Medical Devices, Key Laboratory of Innovation and Transformation of Advanced MedicalDevices of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Key Laboratory of Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China)
2(Beihang University-Beijing Aeonmed Co. Ltd. Joint Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment Technology of Respiratory System and Related Diseases, Beijing 100191, China)
3(Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China)
4(State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract In intelligent closed-loop ventilation control, the physiological model of the respiratory system must be consistent with the patient′s actual condition, and its parameter estimation must be real-time and effective.Using the parameter estimation method of constrained optimization, models that can reflect the pathological conditions of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients as well as can be used for real-time estimation were compared and verified. In this study, we used numerical simulation data and clinical data to estimate parameters of respiratory mechanics models with different complexities. The estimated results were used to reconstruct airway pressure. By comparing the estimation results and reconstruction results among different models, the mathematical description of respiratory mechanics problems suitable for mechanical ventilation COPD was selected. For four models with the different complexities, the corresponding parameter estimation methods were established. By using the simulation and clinical data, a constrained optimization parameter estimation method was applied to different models. Comparative analysis between the reconstructed airway pressure (using estimated resistance and elasticity) and input airway pressure demonstrated that the elastic nonlinear and resistance nonlinear models exhibited the smallest root mean square error (RMSE) in simulation data. For the 12 respiratory cycle data of 6 clinical cases, the resistance nonlinear model achieved the lowest RMSE (M=1.55 cmH2O, SD=0.69 cmH2O) among the evaluated models. The multiple comparison results of repeated measures ANOVA showed that the resistance nonlinear model statistically significantly outperformed the other models (P<0.05). The results showed that according to the simulation data and clinical data in this study, the resistance nonlinear model was more appropriate model of ventilated COPD. Based on the application of constraint optimization method for real-time parameter estimation of mechanical ventilation, the resistance nonlinear model reflected the respiratory mechanics characteristics of COPD better. The results can be used for monitoring respiratory mechanics of COPD, and also provide a basis for the intelligent parameter setting and setting of ventilators.
|
|
Received: 26 May 2025
|
|
|
| About author:: #Member,Chinese Society of Biomedical Engineering |
|
|
|
[1] Otis AB, Mckerrow CB, Bartlett R A, et al. Mechanical factors in distribution of pulmonary ventilation [J]. J Appl Physiol, 1956, 8(4): 427-443.
[2] Arunachalam GR, Chiew YS, Tan CP, et al. Patient asynchrony modelling during controlled mechanical ventilation therapy [J]. Comput Meth Prog Bio, 2020, 183: 105103.
[3] Chiew YS, Tan CP, Chase JG, et al. Assessing mechanical ventilation asynchrony through iterative airway pressure reconstruction [J]. Comput Meth Prog Bio, 2018, 157: 217-224.
[4] Major V, Corbett S, Redmond D, et al. Respiratory mechanics assessment for reverse-triggered breathing cycles using pressure reconstruction [J]. Biomed Signal Process Control, 2016, 23: 1-9.
[5] Morton SE, Dickson J, Chase JG, et al. A virtual patient model for mechanical ventilation [J]. Comput Meth Prog Bio, 2018, 165: 77-87.
[6] Li Zongwei, Pei Yanbin, Wang Yuqi, et al. An enhanced respiratory mechanics model based on double-exponential and fractional calculus [J]. Front Phys, 2023, 14:15.
[7] der Klei TC, Sun Qianhui, Chase JG, et al. Pulmonary response prediction through personalized basis functions in a virtual patient model [J]. Comput Meth Prog Bio, 2024, 244: 107988.
[8] Langdon R, Docherty PD, Chiew YS, et al. Extrapolation of a non-linear autoregressive model of pulmonary mechanics [J]. Math Biosci, 2017, 284(2): 32-39.
[9] Langdon R, Docherty PD, Chiew YS, et al. Use of basis functions within a non-linear autoregressive model of pulmonary mechanics [J]. Biomed Signal Process Control, 2016, 27: 44-50.
[10] Sun QianHui, Chase JG, Zhou Cong, et al. Error propagation and uncertainty analysis in a virtual patient model for lung mechanics [J]. Comput Biol Med, 2025, 194: 110485.
[11] Ghafarian P, Jamaati H, Hashemian SM. A review on human respiratory modeling [J]. Tanaffos, 2016, 15(2): 61-69.
[12] Bates JT. Lung Mechanics: An Inverse Modeling Approach [M]. Cambridge: CUP, 2009: 13-13.
[13] Suki B, Bates JH. A nonlinear viscoelastic model of lung tissue mechanics [J]. J Appl Physiol, 1991, 71(3): 826-833.
[14] Maksym GN, Kearney RE, Bates JH. Nonparametric block-structured modeling of lung tissue strip mechanics [J]. Ann Biomed Eng, 1998, 26(2): 242-252.
[15] Sánchez-Ocampo M, Bonet I, López-Isaza S, et al. Nonlinear N - Compartments model of respiratory mechanics considering viscoelasticity, inertia and surface tension properties [J]. Resp Physiol Neurobi, 2023, 309:8.
[16] Polak A G, Mroczka J. Nonlinear model for mechanical ventilation of human lungs [J]. Comput Biol Med, 2006, 36(1): 4-741-58.
[17] Hou SP, Meskin N, Haddad WM. A general multicompartment lung mechanics model with nonlinear resistance and compliance respiratory parameters [C] //American Control Conference. Portland: IEEE, 2014, 566-571.
[18] Liu Tianya, Wang Yuxing, Ma Jian, et al. Effects of changing small airway mechanics and inspiratory flow waveforms on pulmonary ventilation: a modeling study [C] //World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering. Toronto: IFMBE, 2015, 51: 350-354.
[19] Major V, Corbett S, Redmond D, et al. Respiratory mechanics assessment for reverse-triggered breathing cycles using pressure reconstruction [J]. Biomed Signal Process Control, 2016, 23: 1-9.
[20] Karamolegkos N, Albanese A, Isaza F, et al. Patient emulator: A tool for testing mechanical ventilation therapies [C] //Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Orlando: IEEE, 2016: 4321-4324.
[21] Fresnel E, Muir JF, Letellier C. Realistic human muscle pressure for driving a mechanical lung [J]. EPJ Nonlinear Biomed Phys. 2014, 2: 7.
[22] Schranz C, Docherty PD, Chiew YS, et al. Iterative integral parameter identification of a respiratory mechanics model [J]. Biomed Eng Online, 2012, 11: 38.
[23] Schranz C, Knöbel C, Kretschmer J, et al. Hierarchical Parameter Identification in Models of Respiratory Mechanics [J]. IEEE T Bio-Med Eng, 2011, 58(11): 3234-3241.
[24] Redmond DP, Chiew YS, Major V, et al. Evaluation of model-based methods in estimating respiratory mechanics in the presence of variable patient effort [J]. Comput Meth Prog Bio, 2016: S0169260715303588.
[25] Vassiliou MP, Amygdalou A, Psarakis CJ, et al. Volume and flow dependence of respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated COPD patients [J]. Resp Physiol Neurobi, 2003, 135(1): 87-96.
[26] Polak AG. Analysis of multiple linear regression algorithms used for respiratory mechanics monitoring during artificial [J]. Comput Meth Prog Bio, 2011, 101(2): 126-134.
[27] Polak AG. Respiratory mechanics monitoring during artificial ventilation: batch algorithms and their accuracy [J]. IFAC-PapersOnline, 2009, 42(12): 151-156.
[28] Peslin R, Silva JF, Chabot F, et al. Respiratory mechanics studied by multiple linear regression in unsedated ventilated patients [J]. Eur Respir J, 1992, 5(7): 871-878.
[29] Vicario F, Karamolegkos N, Seiver A. Noninvasive estimation of respiratory mechanics in spontaneously breathing ventilated patients: a constrained optimization approach [J]. IEEE T Bio-Med Eng, 2016, 63(4): 775-787.
[30] 王哲, 乔惠婷, 许丽嫱, 等. 针对有自主呼吸慢阻肺患者的无创动态呼吸力学参数估计 [J]. 医用生物力学, 2019, 34(4): 404-410.
[31] Victor MH, Maximo MROA, Matsumoto MMS, et al. Mixed-integer quadratic programming approach for noninvasive estimation of respiratory effort profile during pressure support ventilation [J]. Int J Numer Meth Bio, 2023, 39(1): e3668.
[32] Lerios T, Knopp JL, Holder-Pearson L, et al. An identifiable model of lung mechanics to diagnose and monitor COPD [J]. Comput Biol Med, 2023, 152: 106430.
[33] Marinakis G, Paraschos M, Patrani M, et al. Non-interventional monitoring of expiratory flow limitation during experimental mechanical ventilation [J]. ERJ Open Research, 2021, 7: 00264-2020.
[34] Scharffenberg M, Mandelli M, Bluth T, et al. Respiratory mechanics and mechanical power during low vs high positive end-expiratory pressure in obese surgical patients-a sub-study of the PROBESE randomized controlled trial [J]. J Clin Anesth, 2024, 92: 111242.
[35] Global Strategy for Prevention. Diagnosis and management of COPD: 2024 report. (2024) [EB/OL]. https://goldcopd.org/2025-gold-report/,2024-11/2025-05-26. |
|
|
|
