|
|
|
| Cognitive Status Prediction for Alzheimer′s Disease via the Attention and LSTM-enhanced Neural Network |
| Yang Zelin1, Yang Kai1, Ren Xiaomei2, Xu Jun1, Zeng Xian1, Wan Zhuo1, Huang Yunzhi1#* |
1(Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Intelligent Medical Image Computing, School of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China) 2(College of Electrical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Alzheimer′s disease (AD) is an irreversible neurodegenerative disease, and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is the intermediate transition state from normal control (NC) to AD, thereby MCI is a crucial monitoring state of early intervention treatment for AD. This motivates us to propose a model for predicting the cognitive status and the possible translation in the future. Our model employed the multilayer perceptron (MLP) for cognitive status recognition based on the longitudinal electronic healthy records (EHR). As the recorded data contained longitudinal changes, we integrated the attention block and long-short-term memory network (LSTM) module with the backbone MLP. In this way, our model captured both the spatial- and temporal-relationship across features at multiple timepoints. Two type experiments were conducted on 1 313 cases from ADNI dataset and 5 209 cases NACC dataset, consisting of a baseline visiting record and the following-up records every 6 months: (1) single-time-point cognitive status prediction with multiple previous visiting records, and (2) multiple-time-point cognitive statuses simultaneously prediction with merely previous single-time-point visiting record. The proposed method made a desirable prediction on the cognitive status. Especially, based on the trained models over the 2nd, 3rd, 5th, and 6th time point records, we achieved average F2 scores of 0.87, 0.88, 0.91, and 0.91 when predicting the corresponding subsequential single-time-point cognitive status, respectively; and achieved average F2 scores of 0.84, 0.86, 0.88, and 0.89 when predicting the corresponding next two-, three-, and four-time points cognitive status, respectively. Compared to the gated recurrent unit, the corresponding F2 scores were improved by 0.03, 0.01, 0.03, and 0.02 when predicting the corresponding subsequential single-time-point cognitive status, respectively, and the average F2 scores were improved by 0.04, 0.05, 0.02, and 0.02 when predicting the corresponding next two-, three-, and four-time points cognitive status, respectively. These results demonstrated a superior performance of the proposed method in predicting cognitive status as compared to the state-of-the-art methods, e.g., MLP, gated recurrent unit and the traditional machine learning classifiers, and can be useful for early intervention treatment for AD patients.
|
|
Received: 18 May 2024
|
|
|
| About author:: #Member,Chinese Society of Biomedical Engineering |
|
|
|
[1] Huang L, Jin Y, Gao Y, et al. Longitudinal clinical score prediction in Alzheimer′s disease with soft-split sparse regression based random forest[J]. Neurobiology of aging,2016,46: 180-191. [2] Scheltens P, De Strooper B, Kivipelto M, et al. Alzheimer′s disease[J]. The Lancet, 2021, 397(10284): 1577-1590. [3] Petersen RC, Caracciolo B, Brayne C, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: a concept in evolution[J]. Journal of Internal Medicine, 2014, 275(3): 214-228. [4] Park S, Hong CH, Lee D, et al. Prospective classification of Alzheimer′s disease conversion from mild cognitive impairment[J]. Neural Networks, 2023, 164: 335-344. [5] Bucholc M, Titarenko S, Ding X, et al. A hybrid machine learning approach for prediction of conversion from mild cognitive impairment to dementia[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 217: 119541. [6] Tábuas-Pereira M, Baldeiras I, Duro D, et al. Prognosis of early-onset vs late-onset mild cognitive impairment: comparison of conversion rates and its predictors[J]. Geriatrics, 2016, 1(2): 11. [7] Brand AL, Lawler PE, Bollinger JG, et al. The performance of plasma amyloid beta measurements in identifying amyloid plaques in Alzheimer′s disease: a literature review[J]. Alzheimer′s Research & Therapy, 2022, 14(1): 195. [8] 宋昕, 洪羽蓉, 胡秋莹. 阿尔兹海默病发病原因及机制的研究进展[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2015, 14(10): 871-872. [9] Scheltens P, De Strooper B, Kivipelto M, et al. Alzheimer′s disease[J]. The Lancet, 2021, 397(10284): 1577-1590. [10] 石珂宁, 李冰玉, 巴茂文, 等. 载脂蛋白Eε4、脑脊液生长相关蛋白-43与轻度认知障碍个体认知及神经变性的相关性研究[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(7): 11975-11982. [11] Armstrong RA. Risk factors for Alzheimer′s disease[J]. Folia Neuropathologica, 2019, 57(2): 87-105. [12] 钱胜男, 于明. 预测轻度认知障碍向阿尔茨海默病转化的生物标志物的研究进展[J]. 中华神经医学杂志, 2020, 19(5): 519-524. [13] Li Q, Yang X, Xu J, et al. Early prediction of Alzheimer′s disease and related dementias using real-world electronic health records[J]. Alzheimer′s & Dementia, 2023, 19(8): 3506-3518. [14] Tanveer M, Richhariya B, Khan RU, et al. Machine learning techniques for the diagnosis of Alzheimer′s disease: a review[J]. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), 2020, 16(1s): 1-35. [15] Sudharsan M, Thailambal G. Alzheimer′s disease prediction using machine learning techniques and principal component analysis (PCA)[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, 81: 182-190. [16] Kapoor M, Kapoor M, Shukla R, et al. Early diagnosis of Alzheimer′s disease using machine learning based methods[C]//Proceedings of the 2021 Thirteenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing. Noida: Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, 2021: 70-76. [17] Moore PJ, Lyons TJ, Gallacher J, et al. Random forest prediction of Alzheimer′s disease using pairwise selection from time series data[J]. PLoS ONE, 2019, 14(2): e0211558. [18] Lee G, Nho K, Kang B, et al. Predicting Alzheimer′s disease progression using multi-modal deep learning approach[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 1952. [19] Nguyen M, Sun N, Alexander DC, et al. Modeling Alzheimer′s disease progression using deep recurrent neural networks[C]//2018 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging (PRNI). Singapore: IEEE, 2018: 1-4. [20] Vaid A, Jaladanki SK, Xu J, et al. Federated learning of electronic health records to improve mortality prediction in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: machine learning approach[J]. JMIR Medical Informatics, 2021, 9(1): e24207. [21] Yadav P, Steinbach M, Kumar V, et al. Mining electronic health records (EHRs) A survey[J]. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 2018, 50(6): 1-40. [22] Taunk K, De S, Verma S, et al. A brief review of nearest neighbor algorithm for learning and classification[C]//2019 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICCS). Madurai: IEEE, 2019: 1255-1260. [23] Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al. Attention is all you need[C]// Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Long Beach: Curran Associates, 2017: 5998-6008. [24] Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A, et al. Deep Learning[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016. [25] Yu Y, Si X, Hu C, et al. A review of recurrent neural networks: LSTM cells and network architectures[J]. Neural Computation, 2019, 31(7): 1235-1270. [26] Lei B, Yang M, Yang P, et al. Deep and joint learning of longitudinal data for Alzheimer′s disease prediction[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2020, 102: 107247. [27] Hong X, Lin R, Yang C, et al. Predicting Alzheimer′s disease using LSTM[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 80893-80901. [28] Aqeel A, Hassan A, Khan MA, et al. A long short-term memory biomarker-based prediction framework for Alzheimer′s disease[J]. Sensors, 2022, 22(4): 1475. [29] Al Olaimat M, Martinez J, Saeed F, et al. PPAD: a deep learning architecture to predict progression of Alzheimer′s disease[J]. Bioinformatics, 2023, 39(Supplement_1): i149-i157. [30] Song QJ, Jiang HY, Liu J. Feature selection based on FDA and F-score for multi-class classification[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 81: 22-27. [31] Tahami Monfared AA, Byrnes MJ, White LA, et al. Alzheimer′s disease: epidemiology and clinical progression[J]. Neurology and Therapy, 2022, 11(2): 553-569. [32] Guest FL, Rahmoune H, Guest PC. Early diagnosis and targeted treatment strategy for improved therapeutic outcomes in Alzheimer′s disease[J]. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 2020, 1260: 175-191. [33] Arya AD, Verma SS, Chakarabarti P, et al. A systematic review on machine learning and deep learning techniques in the effective diagnosis of Alzheimer′s disease[J]. Brain Informatics, 2023, 10(1): 17. |
| [1] |
Mei Xiajin, Ma Yuliang, Zhang Wenxin, Lv Qiang. MACD-Net: Spine Image Segmentation Based on Multi-Dimensional Attention and Cascaded Decoding[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2025, 44(5): 523-532. |
| [2] |
Fan Shanhui, Liang Shuxin, Wang Zhiwen, Wei Kaihua, Wang Qiang, Li Lihua. Research and Applications of Attention-Enhanced Generative Adversarial Network in MedicalImage Generation[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2025, 44(4): 478-493. |
|
|
|
|