|
|
Diagnosis of Alzheimer′s Disease with Sparse Association of Whole Brain Anatomical Markers |
Zheng Fei, Tang Qiling*, Liu Ruxuan, Zhang Meiling, Ge Wei |
(School of Biomedical Engineering, South-Central Minzu University, Wuhan 430074, China) |
|
|
Abstract Alzheimer′s disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disease with progressive impairment of memory and other mental functions, which is the main cause of death in the elderly. How to make an accurate diagnosis of AD is crucial. Existing research methods ignore the relationship between potential features. However, according to biological verification, it is known that many brain regions in the human brain are interconnected anatomically and functionally. Therefore, focusing on the characteristic correlation of different brain regions is beneficial to improve the detection performance of brain cognitive diseases. In this paper, we propose a data-driven method for automatic recognition of anatomical markers in whole brain structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), extract block features based on anatomical points, deeply fuse the features of each block using global correlation, and realize the correlation of various brain regions by calculating the interaction between blocks. Secondly, according to the difference of correlation degree between blocks, thresholding processing is carried out, and redundant information is removed by sparse correlation module to further improve the distinguishing ability of features. Finally, classification model is constructed by using the deep features after sparse to predict Alzheimer′s disease individuals. The experimental results showed that the accuracy and sensitivity of the method reached0.936 8 and 0.921 1, respectively, when the ADNI-1 dataset containing 198 AD patients and 224 healthy subjects were trained, and the ADNI-2 dataset containing 152 AD and 196 healthy subjects were tested. The proposed method takes into account the relationship between blocks and the difference of correlation degree, and can diagnose Alzheimer′s disease more effectively.
|
Received: 29 April 2022
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
*E-mail:qltang@mail.scuec.edu.cn
|
|
|
|
[1] 周文, 王瑜, 李长胜, 等. LightGBM算法在阿尔茨海默症结构磁共振成像分类中的应用 [J]. 中国医学物理学杂志, 2019, 36(4): 42-47. [2] Gauthier S, Rosa-Neto P, Morais JA, et al. Journey through the diagnosis of dementia [C]//World Alzheimer Report 2021. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International, 2021: 19-20. [3] Frisoni GB, Fox NC, Jack C R, et al. The clinical use of structural MRI in Alzheimer disease [J]. Nature Reviews Neurology, 2010, 6(2): 67-77. [4] Klöppel S, Stonnington CM, Chu C, et al. Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer′s disease [J]. Brain, 2008, 131(3): 681-689. [5] Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry—the methods [J]. Neuroimage, 2000, 11(6): 805-821. [6] Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks [J]. Machine Learning, 1995, 20(3): 273-297. [7] Hinrichs C, Singh V, Xu Guofan, et al. MKL for robust multi-modality AD classification [C]//Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention(MICCAI). Berlin: Springer, 2009: 786-794. [8] Demiriz A, Bennett KP, Shawe-Taylor J. Linear programming boosting via column generation [J]. Machine Learning, 2002, 46(1-3): 225-254. [9] Zhang Daoqiang, Wang Yaping, Zhou Luping, et al. Multimodal classification of Alzheimer′s disease and mild cognitive impairment [J]. Neuroimage, 2011, 55(3): 856-867. [10] Wang Lei, Beg F, Ratnanather T, et al. Large deformation diffeomorphism and momentum based hippocampal shape discrimination in dementia of the Alzheimer type [J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2007, 26(4): 462-470. [11] Sørensen L, Igel C, Hansen NL, et al. Early detection of Alzheimer′s disease using MRI hippocampal texture [J]. Human Brain Mapping, 2016, 37(3):1148-1161. [12] Zhang Jun, Gao Yue, Gao Yaozong, et al. Detecting anatomical landmarks for fast Alzheimer′s disease diagnosis [J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2016, 35(12): 2524-2533. [13] Lian Chunfeng, Liu Mingxia, Zhang Jun, et al. Hierarchical fully convolutional network for joint atrophy localization andAlzheimer′s disease diagnosis using structural MRI [J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2020, 42(4): 880-893. [14] Sled JG, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data [J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1998, 17(1): 87-97. [15] Wang Yaping, Nie Jingxin, Yap PT, et al. Robust deformable-surface-based skull-stripping for large-scale studies [C]//Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention(MICCAI), Berlin: Springer, 2011: 635-642. [16] Holmes CJ, Hoge R, Collins L, et al. Enhancement of MR images using registration for signal averaging[J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1998, 3(2): 324-333. [17] Mardia KV. Assessment of multinormality and the robustness of Hotelling′s T2 test [J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1975, 24(2): 163-171. [18] Coito A, Michel CM, Vulliemoz S, et al. Directed functional connections underlying spontaneous brain activity [J]. Human Brain Mapping, 2019, 40(3): 879-888. [19] Najib A, Lorberbaum JP, Kose S, et al. Regional brain activity in women grieving a romantic relationship breakup [J]. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2004, 161(12): 2245-2256. [20] Wee CY, Yap PT, Zhang D, et al. Group-constrained sparse fMRI connectivity modeling for mild cognitive impairment identification [J]. Brain Struct Funct, 2014, 219(2): 641-656. [21] Schwarz AJ, McGonigle J. Negative edges and soft thresholding in complex network analysis of resting state functional connectivity data [J]. Neuroimage, 2011, 55(3) :1132-1146. [22] Heuvel MPD, Lange SC, Zalesky A, et al. Proportional thresholding in resting-state fMRI functional connectivity networks and consequences for patient-control connectome studies: issues and recommendations [J]. Neuroimage, 2017, 152: 437-449. [23] Li Fan, Cheng Danni, Liu Manhua. Alzheimer′s disease classification based on combination of multi-model convolutional networks [C]//2017 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST). Beijing: IEEE, 2017: 1-5. [24] Liu Mingxia, Zhang Jun, Adeli E, et al. Landmark-based deep multi-instance learning for brain disease diagnosis [J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2018, 43: 157-168. [25] Liu Manhua, Li Fan, Yan Hao, et al. A multi-model deep convolutional neural network for automatic hippocampus segmentation and classification in Alzheimer′s disease [J]. Neuroimage. 2020, 208:116459. [26] Wen Junhao, Thibeau-Sutre E, Diaz-Melo M, et al. Convolutional neural networks for classification of Alzheimer′s disease: overview and reproducible evaluation [J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2020, 63: 101694. [27] Zhang Zhehao, Gao Linlin, Jin Guang, et al. THAN: task-driven hierarchical attention network for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease [J]. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 2021, 11(7):3338-3354. [28] Zhang Ling, Xin Bowen, Yan Shaozhen, et al. Multi-stratification feature selection for diagnostic analysis of Alzheimer′s disease [C]//2021 Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA), Gold Coast: IEEE, 2021: 1-7. [29] Gao Xinyu, Shi Feng, Shen Dinggang, et al. Task-Induced pyramid and attention GAN for multimodal brain image imputation and classification in Alzheimer′s disease [J]. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2022, 26(1): 36-43. [30] Cao Peng, Liang Wei, Zhang Kai, et al. Joint feature and task aware multi-task feature learning for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis [C]//2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). Houston: IEEE, 2021: 2643-2650. |
[1] |
Fu Yinghua, Li Jiang, Pan Dongyan, Wang Guozheng, Fu Dongxiang. Change Detection Based on Sparse Representation for Retina Fundus Image Pair[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2019, 38(5): 540-548. |
[2] |
Han Xiuzhi, Zhao Ximei, Yu Kexin, Wang Guodong. An Algorithm of the LBP Feature Extraction Method Combining Sparse Representation in Liver Diseases Recognition[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2017, 36(6): 647-653. |
|
|
|
|