|
|
Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles-Induced Oxidative Stress Involved with GSK-3β Caused Renal Cytotoxicity |
Lv Yinyin1,Li Ke1,Yi Wei1,Liu Supeng1,Zhou Jie1,2* |
1(Faculty of Basic Medicine, School of Medicine, Yichun University, Yichun 336000, Jiangxi, China) 2(The Center For Translational Medicine,Yichun University, Yichun 336000, Jiangxi, China) |
|
|
Abstract The purpose of the research is to investigate the roles of oxidative stress and GSK-3β in mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs)-induced nephrotoxicity, and the potential protective effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC). The NRK-52E cells were exposed to 400 μg/mL MSNs, or were pre-treated with 1 μmol/L NAC followed by MSNs. After the treatments, the viability of NKR-52E cells was determined using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl) -2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The fluorescent probe JC-1 was used to determine the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). The levels of GSK-3β related proteinswere measured by using western blot. And the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH) and catalase (CAT) were detected to evaluate the antioxidant effects. After 24 h of exposure, MSNs produced severe cytotoxicity in the NRK-52E cells with an IC50 value of (438.6±7.1) μg/mL. After treatment with 400 μg/mL MSNs for 24 h, the rate of NRK-52E cell viability was significantly decreased to 47.57%±2.03%, and the activities of SOD, GSH, CAT were respectively decreased to 39.74%±2.23%、51.42%±3.08%、46.05%±3.71% (P<0.001). 400 μg/mL MSNs also significantly activated the GSK-3β pathway and subsequently triggered cell death by depolarizing the ΔΨm, which opened the mitochondrial permeability transition pores, released cytochrome c (Cyt C) and, ultimately, activated caspase-3 (P<0.001). And the 400 μg/mL MSNs-induced significantly toxic injuries of NRK-52E cells could be attenuated by the pretreatment of NAC (P<0.01). MSNs induced renal cytotoxicity via oxidative stress, which was associated with up-regulation GSK-3β activation. NAC can attenuate mitochondrial dysfunction, enhance the antioxidative ability of renal cells and prevent oxidative stress injury induced by MSNs.
|
Received: 27 December 2017
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 周婕, 李艳, 罗成. 介孔二氧化硅纳米粒的医学应用及安全性研究进展[J]. 中国新药与临床杂志, 2017, 36(3):124-130. [2] Liu Y, Ding X, Li J, et al. Enzyme responsive drμg delivery system based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles for tumor therapy in vivo.[J]. Nanotechnology, 2015, 26(14). [3] Shi Y, Miller ML, Pasqua A J, et al. Biocompatibility of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles[J]. Comments on Inorganic Chemistry, 2016, 36(2): 61-80. [4] Niu M, Zhong H, Shao H, et al. Shape-Dependent Genotoxicity of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles and Cellular Mechanisms.[J]. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2016, 16(3). [5] Liu T, Li L, Fu C, et al. Pathological mechanisms of liver injury caused by Continuous intraperitoneal injection of silica nanoparticles[J]. Biomaterials. 2012, 33(7):2399-407. [6] Chen Xi, Jie Zhou, Shuzhang Du, Shaojun Peng. Autophagy upregulation promotes macrophages to escape MSNs-induced NF-κB dependent inflammation [J]. Inflamm Res. 2016,65(4): 325-41. [7] Wang J, Teng Z, Tian Y, et al. Increasing cellular uptake of mesoporous silica nanoparticles in human embryonic kidney cell line 293T cells by using Lipofectamine 2000.[J]. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology, 2013, 9(11): 1882-1890. [8] Heikkila T, Santos HA, Kumar N, et al. Cytotoxicity study of ordered mesoporous silica MCM-41 and SBA-15 microparticles on Caco-2 cells[J]. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 2010,74(3): 483-494. [9] Ahamed M. Silica nanoparticles-induced cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and apoptosis in cultured A431 and A549 cells[J]. Human & Experimental Toxicology, 2013, 32(2): 186-195. [10] Mendoza A, Torreshernandez JA, Ault JG, et al. Silica nanoparticles induce oxidative stress and inflammation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells[J]. Cell Stress & Chaperones, 2014, 19(6): 777-790. [11] Guo K, Lu J, Huang Y, et al. Protective role of PGC-1α in diabetic nephropathy is associated with the inhibition of ROS throμgh mitochondrial dynamic remodeling[J]. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(4):e0125176. [12] Pei Y, Xu Y, Ruan J, et al. Plasma oxidative stress level of IgA nephropathy in children and the effect of early intervention with angiotensin-Converting enzyme inhibitors[J]. Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, 2016, 17(2):14703216647240. [13] Long C, Yang J, Yang H, et al. Attenuation of renal ischemia/reperfusion injury by oleanolic acid preConditioning via its antioxidant, antiinflammatory, and antiapoptotic activities[J]. Molecular Medicine Reports, 2016, 13(6): 4697-4704. [14] Guo B, Zhang W, Xu S, et al. GSK-3β mediates dexamethasone-induced pancreatic β cell apoptosis[J]. Life Sciences, 2016,144: 1-7. [15] Nishihara M, Miura T, Miki T, et al. Modulation of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore complex in GSK-3β-mediated myocardial protection[J]. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 2007, 43(5): 564-570. [16] Park E, Yu KH, Kim DK, et al. Protective effects of N-acetylcysteine against monoSODium glutamate-induced astrocytic cell death[J]. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2014,67: 1-9. [17] Valletregi M, Ramila A, Real A R, et al. A New Property of MCM-41: Drμg Delivery System[J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2001, 13(2): 308-311. [18] Croissant J G, Fatieiev Y, Almalik A, et al. Mesoporous silica and organosilica nanoparticles: Physical chemistry, biosafety, delivery strategies, and biomedical applications[J]. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 30 Nov, 2017[Epub]. [19] Jia L, Li Z, Shen J, et al. Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles mediated co-delivery of paclitaxel and tetrandrine for overcoming multidrμg resistance[J]. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2015,489: 318-330. [20] Han L, Tang C, Yin C. Dual-targeting and pH/redox-responsive multi-layered nanocomplexes for smart co-delivery of doxorubicin and siRNA[J]. Biomaterials. 2015,60:42-52. [21] Zhou X, Feng W, Qiu K, et al. BMP-2 Derived Peptide and Dexamethasone Incorporated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Enhanced Osteogenic Differentiation of Bone Mesenchymal Stem Cells[J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2015,7(29): 15777-15789. [22] Mondragón L,MasN,FerragudV,et al. Enzyme-responsive intracellular-Controlled release using silica mesoporous nanoparticles capped with ε-poly-L-lysine[J]. Chemistry. 2014,20(18):5271-81. [23] Ngamcherdtrakul W, Morry J, Gu S, et al. Cationic polymer modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles fortargeted SiRNA delivery to HER2+ breast cancer.[J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2015, 25(18): 2646-2659. [24] Lee S, Kim M, Lee D, et al. The comparative immunotoxicity of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and colloidal silica nanoparticles in mice[J]. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2013, 8: 147-158. [25] Kramer L, Winter G, Baur B, et al. Quantitative and correlative biodistribution analysis of (89)Zr-labeled mesoporous silica nanoparticles intravenously injected into tumor-bearing mice.[J]. Nanoscale, 2017, 9(27): 9743-9753. [26] Zhou M, Xie L, Fang C, et al. ImpliCATions for blood-brain-barrier permeability, in vitro oxidative stress and neurotoxicity potential induced by mesoporous silica nanoparticles: effects of surface modifiCATion[J]. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(4): 2800-2809. [27] He Q, Zhang Z, Gao F, et al. In vivo biodistribution and urinary excretion of mesoporous silica nanoparticles: effects of particle size and PEGylation.[J]. Small, 2011, 7(2): 271-280. [28] Shao D, Lu M, Zhao Y, et al. The shape effect of magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles on endocytosis, biocompatibility and biodistribution.[J]. Acta Biomaterialia, 2017: 531-540. [29] Zhao Y, Yu W, Fu R, et al. A comparison between sphere and rod nanoparticles regarding their in vivo biological behavior and pharmacokinetics[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1):4131. [30] Mittal M, Siddiqui MR, Tran K, et al. Reactive oxygen species in inflammation and tissue injury[J]. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 2014, 20(7): 1126-1167. [31] Angara S, Ryter S W, Choi M E. Oxidative stress and autophagy: Crucial modulators of kidney injury[J]. Redox Biol, 2015, 4:208-214. [32] Kim J. Spermidine rescues proximal tubular cells from oxidative stress and necrosis after ischemic acute kidney injury[J]. Archives of Pharmacal Research, 2017, 40(10):1197-1208. [33] Kaushal GP, Shah SV. Autophagy in acute kidney injury[J]. Kidney International, 2016, 89(4): 779-791. [34] Zhao S, Fu J, Liu X, et al. Activation of Akt/GSK-3beta/beta-CATenin signaling pathway is involved in survival of neurons after traumatic brain injury in rats[J]. Neurological Research, 2012, 34(4): 400-407. [35] Bernardi P. The mitochondrial permeability transition pore: a mystery solved?[J]. Frontiers in Physiology, 2013: 95-95. [36] Cai L, Li Y, Zhang Q, et al. Salidroside protects rat liver against ischemia/reperfusion injury by regulating the GSK-3β/Nrf2-dependent antioxidant response and mitochondrial permeability transition[J]. European Journal of Pharmacology, 2017, 806:32-42. [37] Li XL, Fan JP, Liu JX, et al. Salvianolic acid A protects neonatal cardiomyocytes against hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced injury by preserving mitochondrial function and activating Akt/GSK-3β signals.[J]. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2017, 2:1-8. [38] Sunaga D, Tanno M, Kuno A, et al. Accelerated recovery of mitochondrial membrane potential by GSK-3β Inactivation Affords Cardiomyocytes Protection from Oxidant-Induced Necrosis[J]. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(11): e112529. [39] Ware K, Qamri Z, Ozcan A, et al. N-acetylcysteine ameliorates acute kidney injury but not glomerular hemorrhage in an animal model of warfarin-related nephropathy[J]. American Journal of Physiology-renal Physiology, 2013, 304(12): F1241-1247. [40] Zhang L, Zhu Z, Liu J, et al. Protective effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on renal ischemia/reperfusion injury throμgh Nrf2 signaling pathway[J]. Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction, 2014, 34(5): 396-400. [41] Sandhir R, Sood A, Mehrotra A, et al. N-Acetylcysteine reverses mitochondrial dysfunctions and behavioral abnormalities in 3-nitropropionic acid-induced Huntington′s disease.[J]. Neurodegenerative Diseases, 2012, 9(3): 145-157. |
|
|
|