改性细菌纤维素/羟基磷灰石复合多孔支架合成方法的研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-8021. 2016. 03.011

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (3)

全文: PDF (1293 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要探讨不同合成方法对改性细菌纤维素/羟基磷灰石复合支架微观结构和性能的影响。采用原位复合法、物理混合法及生物矿化法制备改性细菌纤维素(TBC)与羟基磷灰石(HA)复合多孔支架,利用扫描电镜(SEM)、能谱分析(EDX)、X射线衍射(XRD)、傅里叶红外变换光谱(ATR-FTI)对不同方法合成的产物进行微观结构表征,同时通过力学实验确定不同支架的力学性能参数。SEM和ATR-FTI等结果表明,采用原位复合法、物理混合法及生物矿化法都可以成功地将HA复合在TBC的纳米纤维上,但是复合的机理各不相同。原位复合法中HA纳米颗粒是以螯合键的方式与TBC纳米纤维上的羧基联合,而物理混合和生物矿化法HA纳米颗粒是采用静电吸附的方式复合在TBC纤维上。XRD表明,不同方法合成的支架都出现了明显的(211)峰,但峰的形态有明显的差别。力学测试结果表明,复合后产物的力学性能也有很大的差异,采用原位复合的支架强度最低,复合后支架强度由4.67 MPa迅速减小到1.00 MPa,而用生物矿化复合的支架强度最高,复合后支架强度由4.67 MPa增加到到5.55 MPa。通过对不同方法合成的复合支架微观结构的表征和分析,为骨组织工程支架的设计提供依据。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	南方
	王巧莉
	赖琛
	奚廷斐

关键词 ：氧化细菌纤维素, 羟基磷灰石, 多孔支架

Abstract：The purpose of this study is to investigate three kinds of preparation methods for bacterial cellulose and hydroxyapatite sponges and compare the microstructure and characteristics.The modified bacterial cellulose (TBC) and hydroxyapatite (HA) sponges were fabricated by in situ formation, physical mixing orbiomineralization. Samples prepared by the different methods were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy spectrum analysis(EDX),X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier IR transform spectroscopy (ATR-FTI). Furthermore mechanical performance of the sponges prepared with different parameters were tested as well.Experimental results showed that by thein situ formation, physical mixing orbiomineralization HA was successfully deposited on TBC nanofibers, but mechanisms were different.By the in situ formation method, HA nanoparticles took the form of chelate keys associated with TBC nano fibers on the carboxyl. In the physical mixing orbiomineralization methods, HA nanoparticles became electrostatically adsorbed on TBC nanofibers.XRD results showed that there were obvious (211) peaks in the scaffolds synthesized by different methods, but there were significant differences in the morphology of the peaks.Mechanical results showed that microstructure and mechanical properties of sponge also had very big difference with different composite methods. By the in situ formation method, the scaffold minimum intensity was reduced from 4.67MPa to 1.00MPa,while by the biomineralization, scaffold maximum intensitywas increased from 4.67MPa to 5.55MPa. Through the analysis of the microstructure and characterization of the scaffolds,our study could provide the basis for their application to bone tissue engineering.

Key words： oxidation of bacterial cellulose hydroxyapatite sponge

收稿日期: 2015-09-25

PACS:

R318

基金资助:深圳市基础研究项目(JCYJ20140419114548513)

通讯作者: E-mail: xingtingfei@pku.edu.cn

引用本文:

南方, 王巧莉, 赖琛, 奚廷斐. 改性细菌纤维素/羟基磷灰石复合多孔支架合成方法的研究[J]. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2016, 35(3): 330-339.
Nan Fang, Wang Qiaoli, Lai Chen, Xi Tingfei. Research on the Synthesis of Modified Bacterial Cellulose/Hydroxyapatite Sponges. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2016, 35(3): 330-339.

链接本文:

http://cjbme.csbme.org/CN/10.3969/j.issn.0258-8021. 2016. 03.011 或 http://cjbme.csbme.org/CN/Y2016/V35/I3/330

[1] White AA, Best SM. Hydroxyapatitie-Carbon nanotube composites for biomedical application: A review [J]. Int J Appl Ceram Technol, 2007,4(1):1-13.
[2] Chang MC, Ko CC, Dounglas WH. Preparation of hydroxyapatite-gelatin nanocomposite[J]. Biomaterials, 2003,24(17):2853-2862.
[3] Ignjatovic N, Uskokovic D. Synthesis and application of hydroxyapatite/polylactide composite biomaterial [J]. Appl Surf Sci, 2004, 238(1-4):314-319.
[4] Ge ZG, Baguenard S, Lim LY, et al. Hydroxyapatitechitin materials as potential tissue engineered bone substitutes l [J]. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(6):1049-1058.
[5] Zhang L, Li YB, Yang AP, et al. Preparation and in vitroinvestigation of chitosan/nano-hydroxyapatite compositeused as bone substitute materials[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2005,16 (3):213-219.
[6] Cai Zengxiao, Mo Xiumei, Zhang Kuihua, et al. Fabrication of chitosan/silk fibroin composite nanofibers for wound-dressing applications [J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2010, 11(9):3529-3539.
[7] Rapacz-Kmita A, Slosarczyk A, Paszkiewicz Z. Mechanical properties of HAp-ZrO2 composites [J]. J Eur Ceram Soc,2006,26(8):1481-1488.
[8] 黄建文, 徐月敏. 细菌纤维素在组织工程中的应用[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2014,18(3):420-425.
[9] Chen Lai, Shujiang Zhang, Xuanchen Chen,et al. Nanocomposite films based on TEMPO-mediated oxidized bacterial cellulose and chitosan [J].Cellulose,2014, 21:2757-2772.
[10] Retegi A, Algar I, Martin L, et al. Sustainable optically transparent composites based on epoxidized soy-bean oil (ESO) matrix and high contents of bacterial cellulose (BC) [J]. Cellulose, 2012, 19(3):103-109.
[11] Svensson A,Nicklasson E,Harrah T,et al.Cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage [J]. Biomaterials,2005,26: 419 -431.
[12] Carl JM, Bo R, Aase B, et al. Small calitre biosynthetic cellulose blood vessels: 13-months patercy in a sheep model [J]. Scandonavian Cardiovascular Journal, 2012, 46(1):57-62.
[13] Klemm D, Schumann D, Udhardt U, et al.Bacterial synthesized cellulose-aritificial blood vessels for microsurgery. [J]. Prog Polym Sci, 2001;26:1561-1603.
[14] Hutchens SA, Benson RS, Evans BR, et al. Biomimetic synthesis of calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite in a natural hydrogel [J]. Biomaterials,2006,27(26): 4 661-4670.
[15] Wiegand C, Elsner P, Hiple UC. Protease and ROS activities influenced by a composite of bacterial cellulose and collagen type I in vitro [J]. Cellulose, 2006, 13 (6):689-696.
[16] Nurlidar F, Budianto E, Darwis D, et al. Hydroxyapatite deposition on modified bacterial [J]. Cellulose Matrix Macromol Symp. 2015, 353, 128-132.
[17] Zimmermann KA, LeBlanc JM, Sheets KT, et al. Biomimetic design of a bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite for bone healing applications[J].Materials Science and Engineering C, 2011,31:43-49.
[18] Wan YZ, Hong L, Jia SR, et al. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite-bacterial cellulose nanocomposites [J].Composites Science and Technology, 2006, 66:1825-1832.
[19] Fan Xiaoxia, Zhang Tingting, Zhao Zhitong,et al.Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose microfiber/goat bone apatite composites for bone repair[J]. Apllied Polymer Science,2013,129(2):595-603.
[20] Guerra GD, Cristallini C, Urciuoli P, et al. Hydroxyapatite/gelatin/gellan sponges as nanocomposite scaffolds for bone reconstruction[J]. Materials in Medicine,2012,23(1): 51-61.
[21] Luo Honglin, Xiong Guangyao, Zhang Chen, et al. Surface controlled calcium phosphate formation on three-dimensional bacterial cellulose-based nanofibers[J].Materials Science and Engineering C, 2015, 49:526-533.
[22] Gonzalez M, Hemandez E, Ascencio JA, et al.Hydroxyapatite crystals grown on a cellulose matrix using titanium alkoxide as a coupling agent[J]. J Mater Chem,2003,13: 2948-2951.
[23] Okita Y, Saito T, Isogai A. Entire surface oxidation of various cellulose microfibrils by TEMPO-mediated oxidation [J].Biomacromolecules, 2010,11(6):1696-1700.
[24] Lu Chuan, Chen Shiyan, Zheng Yi, et al. TEMPO-mediated oxidation of bacterial cellulose in buffer solution [C]//Han Yafang. Materials Science Forum. Swizerland: Trans Tech Publications Inc,2014,789:90-94.
[25] Lai Chen, Sheng Liyuan, Liao Shibo,et al. Surface characterization of TEMPO-oxidizedbacterial cellulose[J]. Surf Interface Anal,2013, 45: 1673-1679.
[26] Toei K, Kohara T. A conductometric method for colloid titrations [J]. Anal Chimica Acta,1967, 83: 59-65.
[27] Sun Bin, Gu Chunju, Ma Jinhong, et al. Kietic study on TEMPO-mediated selective oxidation of regenerated cellulose [J]. Cellulose, 2005, 12(1): 59-66.
[28] Sotomayor OE, Tippur HV. Role of cell regularity and relative density on elastoplastic compression response of 3D open-cell foam core sandwich structure generated using Voronoi diagrams [J]. Acta Materialia, 2014,78: 301-313.