|
|
|
| Safety Assessment of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells\|Cuttlebone Composite Scaffold |
| Peng Ya1 Qin Yu1 Gu Chunsong2 Yi Hongcheng2 |
1Guizhou Province Osteological Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China
2The Second Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang 550002, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This study is aimed to conduct fabrication and safety evaluation for the rabbit BMSCs-Cuttlebone composite scaffold. BMSCs were separated by density gradient centrifugation and adherence screening method. The BMSCs-Cuttlebone scaffold was cultivated by precipitation method. The composite scaffold was examined by SEM observation and cell viability assay (MTT test). The biological safety of the composite scaffold was evaluated through muscle implantation test. A total of 40 New Zealand rabbit were randomly divided into two groups, and then BMSCs-cuttlebone scaffold (experimental group) or cuttlebone (control group) were implanted. BMSCs of CD29 positive were obtained by the method of density gradient centrifugation effectively. Scanning electron microscope observation showed that the porosity of cuttlefish bone scaffold was 81.730%±6.770%. The cells adhered on the cuttlebone bracket creeping growth and secreted extracellular matrix. Results obtained from MTT assay showed that the number of viable cells on scaffold increased over time. On the day 1, 3, 5, 7 of cultivation, the cells kept proliferating; while on the day 7 and 8, the proliferation decreased and almost stopped on the day 8. Muscle implantation test showed no significant difference existed between the composite scaffold (experimental group) and cuttlebone group (control group) in the blood routine and blood biochemical tests. In the pathological observation, on the day 7, tissue inflammation grade III-IV for both experimental group and control group; on theday 14, the tissue inflammation grade was II-III for the two groups; on the day28, the tissue inflammation was I-II for the two groups; on the day 56, the tissue inflammation was 0-I grade for the two groups; all of which were within the limit of standard. The rabbit BMSCs could be co-cultured with cuttlebone to build complex biological scaffold. The cells embedded in the scaffold kept proliferation for 7 days. The composite scaffold exhibited good biocompatibility in the muscle implantation test.
|
|
Received: 30 November 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Bran GM, Sterr-Straeter, Hrmann K, et al.Apoptosisin bone for tissue engineering [J]. Arch Med Res,2008, 39(5) : 467\|485.
[2] 肖培根.新编中药志[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2006.
[3] 刘艺,张安桢,王和鸣,等.海螵蛸接骨的动物实验研究[J].福建中医药,1988,19(3):49.
[4] 刘永刚,赵富花,何进来.海螵蛸的研究概况[J].时珍国医国药,2005,16(1):72-73.
[5] 周蔚,吴海涛,李采,等.海螵蛸作为组织工程支架材料的实验研究[J].复旦学报:医学版,2007,34(3):438-441.
[6] 易洪城,唐良华,张雪鹏.自体骨髓移植、海螵蛸与玻璃酸钠联合治疗骨缺损的试验研究[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2011,31(8):1122-1126.
[7] 张雪鹏.经皮自体骨髓移植、海螵蛸与玻璃酸钠联合治疗骨缺损的动物实验研究[D].贵阳:贵阳中医学院,2006.
[8] 由少华.解读GB/T16886《医疗器械生物学评价》系列标准[J].中国医疗器械信息,2005,11(1):15-19.
[9] 彭雅,顾春松,易洪城. 全骨髓贴壁培养兔骨髓间充质干细胞的初步研究[J].黔南民族医专学报,2013,26(3):157-161.
[10] 宋世锋,彭磊,王臻. 三维多孔复合人工骨的制备及性能检测[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2009,17(12):928-930.
[11] 裴国献,魏宽海,金丹.组织工程学实验技术[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2006:190-191.
[12] 林春博,杨渊源,陈维平.低渗结合自然沉降法分离兔骨髓间充质干细胞及其鉴定[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2011,15(1):12-16.
[13] 尹航,王晓东,张亚,等. 兔骨髓间充质干细胞复合两种材料体外生物相容性的比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(20):1571-1573.
[14] ISO 10993—6:2007.Biological evaluation of medical devices: part 6:Tests for local effects after implantation[S]. 1994.
[15] GB/T16886—6.医疗器械生物学评价标准:第6部分:植入后局部反应实验[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,1997.
[16] 俞猛.骨组织工程支架材料修复骨缺损的特性[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2010,14(47):8869-8872.
[17] 李爽,朱家源,朱斌,等.大鼠骨髓间充质干细胞的体外分离培养及其生长特性和表型[J].中华实验外科杂志,2007,24(12):1601.
[18] 施新猷.现代医学试验动物学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2000: 60;113.
[19] 张玲.新西兰雄兔部分血液生化指标正常值测定[J].实验动物科学与管理,2001,18(4):41-43.
[20] 周蔚,吴海涛,李采.海螵蛸作为组织工程支架材料的实验研究[J].复旦学报:医学版,2007,34(3):438-441.
[21] 中国药用动物志协作组.中国药用动物志:第一册[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社,1979:44.
[22] 赵忠杰,江佩芬,李昂. 海螵蛸中碳酸钙、微量元素和氨基酸的测定[J]. 中国中药杂志,1990,15(1):41-43. |
|
|
|
