|
|
Prediction of Histological Grade in Invasive Breast Cancer Based on T2-Weighted MRI |
Xie Sudan1, Fan Ming1, Xu Maosheng2, Wang Shiwei2, Li Lihua1* |
1 Institute of Life Information Science and Instrument Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China; 2 Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China |
|
|
Abstract The purpose of this study was to predict the histological grade of invasive breast cancer based on radiomic analysis of T2-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRI). A dataset of 167 invasive breast cancer cases who had preoperative breast MRI with a 3.0 T scanner were collected. Among them, 95 cases were diagnosed as high-grade malignant (Grade 3) invasive breast cancer, while 72 were mediate-grade malignant (Grade 2). Semi-automatic lesion segmentation was performed on each T2-weighted MRI, in which 30 texture and 10 morphological features were extracted. A univariate logistic regression classifier model was implemented to evaluate the performance of the individual feature for discriminating histological grade. Various classifiers including multivariate logistic regression (MLR), support vector machines (SVM) and multi-task learning (MTL) were utilized and compared for classification. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis under leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). P-value was calculated using Student's t test. The best single feature of morphology was the lesion radius, which was the AUC value of 0.742 and P value of 0.749×10-9. The best-performance texture feature was large zone high gray emphasis, with the AUC value of 0.742 and theP value of 0.175×10-3. The AUC values from classifiers of MLR, SVM and MTL were 0.767±0.036, 0.772±0.036 and 0.771±0.037, respectively. The values of specificity were 0.667, 0.653 and 0.708, respectively while the values of sensitivity were 0.747, 0.737 and 0.684, respectively. The results showed that T2-weighted MRI features could be utilized as promising biomarkers for predicting histological grade in invasive breast cancer.
|
Received: 12 December 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries [J]. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2018, 68(6): 394-424. [2] Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: Globocan sources and methods [J]. International Journal of Cancer, 2019, 144(8): 1941-1953. [3] Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Ortiz AP, et al. Cancer statistics for hispanics/latinos, 2018[J]. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2018, 68(6): 425-445. [4] 陈万青, 郑荣寿. 中国女性乳腺癌发病死亡和生存状况[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2015, 42(13): 668-674. [5] Stamatakos MD. Invasive breast cancer[M]//Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer Series: Breast Cancer. 2011: 21-45. [6] Frank GA, Danilova NV, Andreeva I, et al. WHO classification of tumors of the breast, 2012[J]. Arkhiv Patologii, 2013, 75(2): 53-63. [7] Pinder SE, Murray S, Ellis IO, et al. The importance of the histologic grade of invasive breast carcinoma and response to chemotherapy[J]. Cancer, 1998, 83(8): 1529-1539. [8] Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Menon S, et al. Histologic grading is an independent prognostic factor in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast[J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2008, 111(1): 121-127. [9] Kim S, Shin J, Kim D, et al. Correlation between conductivity and prognostic factors in invasive breast cancer using magnetic resonance electric properties tomography (MREPT)[J]. European Radiology, 2016, 26(7): 2317-2326. [10] Elston C. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up[J]. Histopathology, 1991, 19(5), 403-410. [11] Rakha E, Reis-Filho J, Baehner F, et al. Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade[J]. Breast Cancer Research, 2010, 12(4): 207. [12] Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Lee AHS, et al. Prognostic significance of Nottingham histologic grade in invasive breast carcinoma[J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008, 26(19): 3153-3158. [13] Pujara AC, Kim E, Axelrod D, et al. PET/MRI in breast cancer[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2019, 49(2): 328-342. [14] Pop C, Stanciu-Pop C, Drisis S, et al. The impact of breast MRI workup on tumor size assessment and surgical planning in patients with early breast cancer[J]. The Breast Journal, 2018, 24(6): 927-933. [15] Macchini M, Ponziani M, Iamurri AP, et al. Role of DCE-MR in predicting breast cancer subtypes[J]. La Radiologia Medica, 2018, 123(10): 753-764. [16] Park H, Lim Y, Ko ES, et al. Radiomics signature on magnetic resonance imaging: association with disease-free survival in patients with invasive breast cancer[J]. Clinical Cancer Research, 2018, 24(19): 4705-4714. [17] Tahmassebi A, Wengert GJ, Helbich TH, et al. Impact of machine learning with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes in breast cancer patients[J]. Investigative Radiology, 2019, 54(2): 110-117. [18] Ballesio L, Savelli S, Angeletti M, et al. Breast MRI: Are T2 IR sequences useful in the evaluation of breast lesions? [J]. European Journal of Radiology, 2009, 71(1): 96-101. [19] Kuhl CK, Klaschik S, Mielcarek P, et al. Do T2-weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI? [J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1999, 9(2): 187-196. [20] Gallego-Ortiz C, Martel AL. Using quantitative features extracted from T2-weighted MRI to improve breast MRI computer-aided diagnosis (CAD)[J]. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(11): e187501. [21] Henderson S, Purdie C, Michie C, et al. Interim heterogeneity changes measured using entropy texture features on T2-weighted MRI at 3.0 T areassociated with pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer[J]. European Radiology, 2017, 27(11): 4602-4611. [22] Seo M, Ryu JK, Jahng GH, et al. Estimation of T2* relaxation time of breast cancer: correlation with clinical, imaging and pathological features[J]. Korean Journal of Radiology, 2017, 18(1): 238-248. [23] Yuen S, Uematsu T, Kasami M, et al. Breast carcinomas with strong high-signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images: Pathological characteristics and differential diagnosis[J]. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2007, 25(3): 502-510. [24] Bhooshan N, Giger M, Lan L, et al. Combined use of T2-weighted MRI and T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the automated analysis of breast lesions[J]. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2011, 66(2): 555-564. [25] Stierer M, Rosen H, Weber R, et al. Immunohistochemical and biochemical measurement of estrogen and progesterone receptors in primary breast cancer correlation of histopathology and prognostic factors[J]. Annals of Surgery, 1993, 218(1):13-21. [26] Yang Q, Li L, Zhang J, et al. A new quantitative image analysis method for improving breast cancer diagnosis using DCE-MRI examinations[J]. Medical Physics, 2015, 42(1): 103-109. [27] 付举众, 范明, 邵国良, 等. 基于动态增强 MRI 特征的乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效预测研究[J]. 航天医学与医学工程, 2016, 29(1): 39-44. [28] 张承杰, 厉力华. 基于空间FCM与MRF方法的乳腺MRI序列三维病灶分割研究[J]. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2014, 33(2): 202-211. [29] 王世健, 范明, 张娟, 等. 乳腺癌DCE-MRI影像特征与分子分型的关联性研究[J]. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2016, 35(5): 533-540. [30] 李颜娥, 张朋, 范明, 等. 基于乳腺钼靶侧斜位图像的近期乳腺癌风险预测研究[J]. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2018, 37(2): 169-180. [31] Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH. Textural features for image classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1973 (6): 610-621. [32] Thibault G, Fertil B, Navarro C, et al. Shape and texture indexes application to cell nuclei classification [J]. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2013, 27(1): 1357002. [33] Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines[J]. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 2011, 2(3): 1-27. [34] Argyriou A, Evgeniou T, Pontil M. Convex multi-task feature learning[J]. Machine Learning, 2008, 73(3): 243-272. [35] Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B. Estimation of the Youden index and its associated cutoff point[J]. Biometrical Journal: Journal of Mathematical Methods in Biosciences, 2005, 47(4): 458-472. [36] 周嘉琪, 罗娅红. 高侵袭性乳腺癌影像学研究进展[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2017, 26(2): 149-155. [37] 吴健. 乳腺癌组织磁共振T2WI信号特征与增殖细胞核抗原(Ki-67)表达的相关性[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2018(24): 119-123. |
[1] |
Zhao Wenrui, Xu Maosheng, Wang Shiwei, Fan Ming, Li Lihua. Prediction of Histological Grade and Ki-67 Expression inBreast Cancer by DCE-MRI and DWI Features[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2019, 38(2): 176-183. |
[2] |
Wang Huina, Huang Wei, Liu Yihui. Feature Dimension Reduction of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation Prediction Model in Patients with Primary Liver Cancer after Precise Radiotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2017, 36(6): 697-701. |
|
|
|
|