实用化EIT条件下不同激励模式成像效果仿真研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0258-8021. 2015.04.005

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (1)

全文: PDF (3578 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目前常用的电阻抗断层成像(EIT)相邻激励-相邻测量模式下，有限测量分辨率(MR)和信噪比(SNR)的系统往往难于分辨微小电位差，影响图像重建。通过获取16电极EIT系统均匀场在相邻、间隔6电极和相对激励模式下的理想仿真边界电压，分析实用化EIT系统成像对MR和SNR的要求，仿真模拟了不同MR和SNR测量条件下3种激励模式对近场域中心目标A、场域1/2半径处目标B、近场域边缘目标C的成像。图像重建采用TikhonovNoser组合正则化算法，引入图像重建误差函数和结构相似度函数定量评价成像效果。结果表明，各激励模式对不同目标成像要求的MR和SNR不同。MR为1 mV和0.01 mV时，成像效果分别是间隔6电极激励和相邻激励最优；MR为0.1 mV时对模型A、B成像间6激励更优，对模型C成像相邻激励更好。间隔6电极和相对激励对模型A、B、C成像要求的SNR临界值分别为50、40和30 dB，都比相邻激励低10 dB，临界值附近间6成像效果最优，其次是相对激励，SNR高于临界值10 dB时相邻激励成像质量最高。低MR和高MR时影响成像的主要指标分别是各模式边界电压次小值与最小值之差和独立测量数。建议低MR成像时优先选择间6激励，其次是相对激励，高MR时选择相邻激励，MR为0.1 mV时近场域边缘目标成像选择相邻激励而近场域中心目标成像选择间6激励。低SNR和高SNR时影响成像的是测量电压数组整体的数值大小和独立测量数。模型A、B、C成像时若SNR分别在50、40和30 dB的临界值附近建议选择间隔6电极和相对激励，一旦SNR高于临界值10 dB，建议选择相邻激励。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	邓娟¹王磊^{1 &nb}

关键词 ：电阻抗断层成像, 激励模式, 测量分辨率, 信噪比

Abstract：Using the commonly used adjacent excitation patternadjacent measurement pattern in the electrical impedance tomography (EIT), the practical detection system with finite measurement resolution (MR) and signaltonoise ratio (SNR) is always limited to distinguish tiny potential difference of electrodes and then finally make a great impact on image reconstruction. Based on the homogeneous field EIT boundary voltages analysis of adjacent excitation pattern, interval 6 electrodes and opposite excitation pattern in 16 electrodes array system, the MR and SNR requirements for imaging by practical EIT systems were analyzed, images reconstruction of three excitation patterns under different MR and different SNR conditions were simulated for three different image models A, B, C, which are positioned near to the center of the field, at the 1/2 radius of the field and near to the edge of the filed respectively. The combined TikhonovNoser regularization algorithm was adopted and image reconstruction errors function and structure similarity degree function for medical images quality evaluation were introduced to quantitative analysis the imaging effect. Imaging and evaluation results show that different excitation patterns have distinct index requirements of system MR and SNR. When MR was 1 mV, the imaging effect of interval 6 electrodes excitation pattern was the best, while adjacent excitation pattern was the best when MR was 0.01 mV. When MR was 0.01 mV, interval 6 electrodes excitation pattern was better than the adjacent excitation pattern for model A and B while the circumstance is opposite for model C. The critical value requirements of system SNR for Model A, B, C were 50 dB, 40 dB, 30 dB respectively under the interval 6 electrodes and opposite excitation patterns, which were 10 dB lower than the adjacent excitation pattern when imaging for all three models. The best imaging effects of all three model were under interval 6 electrodes excitation pattern when these SNR values near to critical values, followed by opposite excitation patterns. However, once the value of SNR was higher than the critical value, the best quality image was obtained under the adjacent excitation pattern. The main indexes impacting imaging results in low MR system and high MR system were different between the second smallest voltage and the smallest voltage and independent measurement number. It is advised to take interval 6 electrodes excitation pattern as the priority selection and opposite excitation pattern as the second one when system MR is relatively low, while choose adjacent excitation pattern when MR is high. For the 0.1 mV MR, interval 6 electrodes excitation pattern is suggested when imaging for model A and B and adjacent excitation pattern is suggested for model C. The factors impacting imaging results in low and high SNR system are the result of whole measurement voltage data and independent measurement number. When values of the system SNR are near to the critical values of 50 dB, 40 dB and 30 dB for model A, B, C respectively, interval 6 electrodes and opposite excitation pattern are suggested, and the adjacent excitation pattern is suggested once SNR exceeds critical value 10 dB.

Key words： electrical impedance tomography excitation pattern measurement resolution signaltonoise ratio

基金资助:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助；协和青年基金（33320140052）;内蒙古自治区博士基金（2014BS0321）

引用本文:

邓娟¹王磊^{1 &nb. 实用化EIT条件下不同激励模式成像效果仿真研究[J]. 中国生物医学工程学报, 2015, 34(4): 413-420.}

链接本文:

http://cjbme.csbme.org/CN/10.3969/j.issn.0258-8021. 2015.04.005 或 http://cjbme.csbme.org/CN/Y2015/V34/I4/413

［1］任超世，李章勇，王妍，等. 电阻抗断层成像应用基础与临床应用的一些研究进展［J］. 中国生物医学工程学报， 2010，29（2）：300-304.
［2］邓娟，陈素华，沙洪，等. 信噪比对不同EIT图像重建算法的影响研究及评价［J］. 中国生物医学工程学报，2012，31（6）：807-815.
［3］邓娟，陶凌，沙洪，等.测量分辨率对不同EIT算法影响的仿真研究［J］. 军事医学，2013，37（5）：385-389.
［4］Seagar AD, Barber DC, Brown BH. Theoretical limits to sensitivity and resolution in impedance imaging ［J］. Clin Phys Physiol Meas, 1987, 8(SA): S13-S31.
［5］Seagar AD, Brown BH. Limitations in hardware design in impedance imaging ［J］. Clin Phys Physiol Meas, 1987, 8(SA): S85-S90.
［6］Cheney M, Isaacson D. Distinguishability in impedance imaging ［J］. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 1992, 39(8):852-860.
［7］Rafiei\|Naeini M, McCann H. Lownoise current excitation subsystem for medical EIT ［J］. Physiol Meas, 2008, 29(6S): 173-184. 
［8］Wang W, Brown BH, Leatilard AD, et al. Noise equalisation within EIT images ［J］. Physiol Meas, 1995, 15(S2A):211-216.
［9］Kim DY, Wi H, Yoo PJ, et al. Performance evaluation of KHU Mark2 parallel multifrequency EIT system ［J］. J Phys: Conf Ser, 2010, 224(1): 13-16.
［10］Yasin M, Bhm S, Gaggero P, et al. Evaluation of EIT system performance［J］. Physiol Meas, 2011, 32(7):851-857. 
［11］Adler A, Gaggero P, Maimaitijiang YS. Adjacent stimulation and measurement patterns considered harmful ［J］. Physiol Meas, 2011, 32(S01):731-744.
［12］Adler A, Gaggero P, Maimaitijiang YS. Distinguishability in EIT using a hypothesistesting model ［J］. J Phys: Conf Ser, 2010, 224(1):56-59. 
［13］Avis NJ, Barber DC. Adjacent or polar drive: image reconstruction implications in electrical impedance tomography systems employing filtered back projection ［M］. Paris: IEEE Press, 1992:87-88.
［14］Eyüboglu BM. An interleaved drive electrical impedance tomography image reconstruction algorithm ［J］. Physiol Meas, 1996, 17(A):59-71.
［15］Franciane CP, Luis PSB. Some numerical results on the inuence of measurement strategies and load patterns in the EIT inverse problem ［J］. J Phys: Conf Ser, 2010, 224(1):145-148.
［16］罗辞勇，陈民铀，王平. 电阻抗成像交叉测量模式的抗噪性能研究［J］. 仪器仪表学报，2009，1（1）： 1-6.
［17］Lee EJ, Ts ME, Seo JK, et al. Breast EIT using a new projected image reconstruction method with multifrequency measurements ［J］. Physiol Meas, 2012, 33(5):751-758. 
［18］Grychtol B, Adler A,Choice of reconstructed tissue properties affects interpretation of lung EIT images［J］. Physiol Meas, 2014, 35(6):1035-1040.
［19］Zhao Zhanqi, Frerichs I, Pulletz S, et al. The influence of image reconstruction algorithms on linear thorax EIT image analysis of ventilation ［J］. Physiol Meas, 2014, 〖STHZ〗35〖STBZ〗(6):1083-1089.
［20］Gaggero P, Adler A, Brunner J, et al. Electrical impedance tomography system based on active electrodes ［J］. Physiol Meas, 2012, 33(5):831-847.
［21］Cherenin VA, Gulyaev YV, Korjenevsky AV, et al. An electrical impedance tomography system for gynecological application GIT with a tiny electrode array ［J］. Physiol Meas, 2012, 33(5):849-862.
［22］Kao T J, Isaacson D, Newell JC, et al. A 3D reconstruction algorithm for EIT using a handheld probe for breast cancer detection ［J］. Physiol Meas, 2006, 27(5):1-11.
［23］段影影，马建华，陈武凡，等. 改进的结构相似医学图像质量评价方法［J］. 计算机工程与应用，2010，46（2）：145-149.
［24］Wang Zhou, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, et al. Image Quality Assessment: From Error Measurement to Structural Similarity ［J］. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2004, 13(4):600-612.
［25］任超世，王妍. 阻抗成像实用化应用技术研究［J］. 中国医学装备，2007，4（5）：1-5.
［26］Kolehmainen V, Voutilainen A, Kaipio JP. Estimation of nonstationary region boundaries in EITstate estimation approach ［J］. Inverse Problems, 2001, 17(1):1937-1956.
［27］Wang Yan, Sha Hong, Ren Chaoshi. Optimum design of electrode structure and parameters in electrical impedance tomography ［J］. Physiol Meas, 2006, 27(3):291-306.